[pinkypanther]

https://tinyurl.com/ynkxyzd4

[Galilo_l]

我想单心才是无间道

[sgbuffett]

The COP line of questioning one sided and did not give the full perspective. Why wasn't Pitram and Slyvia asked to testify at COP.

If you listen carefully there were many perspectives they did not bother and COP questioning use a technique called leading the witness. You notice he used the phrase " stick with the lie"  which can be an interpretation rather than the fact. 

The whole COP is out to find a way to attack WP leaders and through use of media destroy as much as they can.

This perspective is lost

1. Reeasah Khan went to WP leaders to tell them;
(a) She did jndeed hear a woman complain about police blaming victim
(b) However , it was not at police station but a woman's group session. She was a part of the group session.

2. Reeasah Khan said the the COP testimony that when she went to the WP leaders, they "were angry and wanted her to go to the COP" to clarify.

3. However, upon hearing she was a sexual assault victim who did not share the incident with husband and family, they showed :compassion" towards her.

4. She was advised to "maintain the narrative unless pressed".
because she was not ready to give full personal details.

5. Maintain narrative pertains to truth about (a). If pressed on (b) no choice have to consider revealing painful personal details to the country.

6. Pitram Singh is compassionate person, he does not think only about saving his own skin. Hr did not jnstruct her tonlir but gave her time to clarify given the circumstances that she is a victim who had not informed family.


The whole line of questioning by Edwin Tong is designed to mount an attack on the WP leadership.

But what I see here are people being compassionate.

What matter most is INTENTION behind the action

[happyharvest]

The COP line of questioning one sided and did not give the full perspective.

If you listen carefully there were many perspectives they did not bother and COP questioning use a technique called leading the witness. You notice he used the phrase " stick with the lie"  which can be an interpretation rather than the fact.

The whole COP is out to find a way to attack WP leaders and through use of media destroy as much as they can.

This perspective is lost

1. Reeasah Khan went to WP leaders to tell them;
(a) She did jndeed hear a woman complain about police blaming victim
(b) However , it was not at police station but a woman's group session. She was a part of the group session.

2. Reeasah Khan said the the COP testimony that when she went to the WP leaders, they "were angry and wanted her to go to the COP" to clarify.

3. However, upon hearing she was a sexual assault victim who did not share the incident with husband and family, they showed :compassion" towards her.

4. She was advised to "maintain the narrative unless pressed".
because she was not ready to give full personal details not relevant to the point she was maintain.

5. Maintain narrative pertains to truth about (a). If pressed on (b) no choice have to consider revealing painful personal details to the country.

6. Pitram Singh is compassionate person, he does not think only about saving his own skin.

The whole line of questioning by Edwin Tong is designed to mount an attack on the WP leadership.

But what I see here are people being compassionate.

What matter most is INTENTION behind the action

Unfortunately most sinkies are like sheep.. always being led by the media.

[sgbuffett]

Unfortunately most sinkies are like sheep.. always being led by the media.

Lesson here for opposition is never to let guard down....

[p1acebo]

What a smelly khan

[FangFang]

This time WP jilat again.. Merry Christmas coming.

[Oasis]

You can see the consequences of selecting the wrong calibre. Non value added. 
Shocked to read leader/s told her.....
Personally, cast ???

[dynamite]

The COP line of questioning one sided and did not give the full perspective. Why wasn't Pitram and Slyvia asked to testify at COP.

If you listen carefully there were many perspectives they did not bother and COP questioning use a technique called leading the witness. You notice he used the phrase " stick with the lie"  which can be an interpretation rather than the fact. 

The whole COP is out to find a way to attack WP leaders and through use of media destroy as much as they can.

This perspective is lost

1. Reeasah Khan went to WP leaders to tell them;
(a) She did jndeed hear a woman complain about police blaming victim
(b) However , it was not at police station but a woman's group session. She was a part of the group session.

2. Reeasah Khan said the the COP testimony that when she went to the WP leaders, they "were angry and wanted her to go to the COP" to clarify.

3. However, upon hearing she was a sexual assault victim who did not share the incident with husband and family, they showed :compassion" towards her.

4. She was advised to "maintain the narrative unless pressed".
because she was not ready to give full personal details.

5. Maintain narrative pertains to truth about (a). If pressed on (b) no choice have to consider revealing painful personal details to the country.

6. Pitram Singh is compassionate person, he does not think only about saving his own skin. Hr did not jnstruct her tonlir but gave her time to clarify given the circumstances that she is a victim who had not informed family.


The whole line of questioning by Edwin Tong is designed to mount an attack on the WP leadership.

But what I see here are people being compassionate.

What matter most is INTENTION behind the action

Edwin Tong is 温柔哥哥？

[hansamu]

This "chao khan " is the prelude to the downfall of WP.

Quick action must be taken by WP if it wants to  continue to be a viable opposition in Parliament. 

A clear winning card is  integral to  turn the  table now.

[moonrab]

Khan was strongly supported by Pritnam and opposition supporters when her racist remark against Chinese exposed publicly..

It was Pritnam's own doing...
Who else?

[Fit]

Leading questions, yes! I thought such questioning technique is not allowed by a judge?

[Ola]

RK is like Jac Lau.

That is why PAP loves to listen to lies that supports them.

Lies are music to PAPs' ears.

[jameslee58@hotmail.com]

I m very sure she will leave worker party altogether soon, if she 's found lying again.. You can imagine the consequences

[Instinct]

After all dust settled and damaged done to PS and WP, she will have another version of the story to make it sound like she is a victim.

[Ola]

After all dust settled and damaged done to PS and WP,  she will have another version of the story to make it sound like she is a victim.

When liars are exposed, they will still want attention.

Must act victimised or fake happiness, lor.

Liars will never grow- up.

They are a pain in the arse.

[jameslee58@hotmail.com]

This is all due to jamus
Because sengkang voters wanted to vote him in so much, even though they knew there's a liar in the group, they still continue to vote the entire team in, sigh
I m not sure is worth it, because now the fire is spreading to entire worker party