Scripture readings for Christmas
17-07-2025, 07:00 PM
17-07-2025, 07:02 PM
(17-07-2025, 07:00 PM)pinkpanther Wrote: Which do you trust more? the Quran or the Bible?
The Quran did not say much... Whose authority do you rely on when forming your judgments?
In this case, which is inconsequential to me, we're using the Bible. I'm only discussing this with you because what you're saying, that Ishmael wasn't included in the covenant of circumcision, is false, according to the Bible.
17-07-2025, 07:13 PM
(17-07-2025, 07:02 PM)Ali Imran Wrote: In this case, which is inconsequential to me, we're using the Bible. I'm only discussing this with you because what you're saying, that Ishmael wasn't included in the covenant of circumcision, is false, according to the Bible.
Does the Quran align with or support the position of the Bible?
17-07-2025, 07:23 PM
(17-07-2025, 07:02 PM)Ali Imran Wrote: In this case, which is inconsequential to me, we're using the Bible. I'm only discussing this with you because what you're saying, that Ishmael wasn't included in the covenant of circumcision, is false, according to the Bible.
You moslems circumcise although there are no specific reasons mentioned in the Quran for this practice...if the Quran give reasons why moslems should potong, pls show me
17-07-2025, 09:11 PM
(17-07-2025, 12:28 PM)Ali Imran Wrote: You should be ashamed after this but it seems you have no shame.
Forgive me for saying that but it has to be said.
Why are you offended by what the Bible says and how I interpret it? I thought you don't believe in it...
You said it was corrupted, yet you put the blame on me

You quoted the Bible and claimed that I have no shame...


17-07-2025, 09:12 PM
17-07-2025, 09:13 PM
17-07-2025, 09:15 PM
(17-07-2025, 09:11 PM)pinkpanther Wrote: Why are you offended by what the Bible says and how I interpret it? I thought you didn't believe in it...
You said it was corrupted, yet you put the blame on me
You quoted the Bible and claimed that I have no shame...and Yes, I will forgive your hypocrisy.
You made the statement that Ishmael wasn't included in the covenant of circumcision and I've shown you that Ishmael is included, according to your Bible.
So you made a mistake yet you arrogantly think you're right. After being proven wrong, you should be ashamed.
17-07-2025, 09:16 PM
17-07-2025, 09:17 PM
17-07-2025, 09:17 PM
Does a Muslim need to be circumcised?
Imam Abu Hanifa and Imam Malik consider circumcision to be recommended but not obligatory. This means that if done, its doer is rewarded by God, and if not done, there is no punishment or reward. The scholars agree that circumcision entails the removal of all or the majority of the foreskin that covers the glans only.
Imam Abu Hanifa and Imam Malik consider circumcision to be recommended but not obligatory. This means that if done, its doer is rewarded by God, and if not done, there is no punishment or reward. The scholars agree that circumcision entails the removal of all or the majority of the foreskin that covers the glans only.
As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly
17-07-2025, 09:19 PM
Christians are not required to be circumcised. While physical circumcision was a sign of the covenant with God in the Old Testament, the New Testament teaches that it has been fulfilled and replaced by baptism as the sign of the new covenant in Jesus Christ.
As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly
17-07-2025, 09:19 PM
17-07-2025, 09:21 PM
ce, God commanded him to offer his son Isaac as a burnt offering. While the Quranic account of the sacrifice does not explicitly name the son
As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly
17-07-2025, 09:22 PM
(17-07-2025, 09:17 PM)pinkpanther Wrote: What about isaac and ishmael and Abraham convenant with God
There are many covenants mentioned in the Quran. If we search for the word 'covenant', we will get more than 10, maybe even 20.
And yes, the covenant between God and Abraham is mentioned. The condition of the covenant is that we worship none but God alone.
17-07-2025, 09:24 PM
17-07-2025, 09:25 PM
(17-07-2025, 09:19 PM)Lukongsimi Wrote: Christians are not required to be circumcised. While physical circumcision was a sign of the covenant with God in the Old Testament, the New Testament teaches that it has been fulfilled and replaced by baptism as the sign of the new covenant in Jesus Christ.
Circumcision is mandatory for the followers of Jesus. The religion of Jesus made it mandatory.
17-07-2025, 09:26 PM
(17-07-2025, 09:15 PM)Ali Imran Wrote: You made the statement that Ishmael wasn't included in the covenant of circumcision and I've shown you that Ishmael is included, according to your Bible.
So you made a mistake yet you arrogantly think you're right. After being proven wrong, you should be ashamed.
Why should I be ashamed when you don't believe in the Bible, yet you're trying to defend corrupted scriptures?
By the way you have proven nothing right ...because God did not say that the descendants of Ishmael need to go through circumcision ....so Muhammad was right to not make circumcision compulsory...
While God did not explicitly command circumcision for all of Ishmael's descendants, the biblical narrative in Genesis 17 does include Ishmael in the covenant of circumcision, even though it primarily focuses on the lineage of Isaac. God blessed Ishmael and promised to make him a great nation. However, the covenant of circumcision, as a sign of God's promise, was established with Abraham and his descendants through Isaac.
17-07-2025, 09:28 PM
17-07-2025, 09:29 PM
(17-07-2025, 09:26 PM)pinkpanther Wrote: Why should I be ashamed when you don't believe in the Bible, yet you're trying to defend corrupted scriptures?
By the way you have proven nothing right ...because God did not say that the descendants of Ishmael need to go through circumcision ....so Muhammad was right to not make circumcision compulsory...
While God did not explicitly command circumcision for all of Ishmael's descendants, the biblical narrative in Genesis 17 does include Ishmael in the covenant of circumcision, even though it primarily focuses on the lineage of Isaac. God blessed Ishmael and promised to make him a great nation. However, the covenant of circumcision, as a sign of God's promise, was established with Abraham and his descendants through Isaac.
The covenant wasn't made with Isaac. It was made with Abraham and extended to his descendants. That includes Ishmael.
17-07-2025, 09:30 PM
17-07-2025, 09:32 PM
(17-07-2025, 09:29 PM)Ali Imran Wrote: The covenant wasn't made with Isaac. It was made with Abraham and extended to his descendants. That includes Ishmael.
The circumcision covenant was initially made with Abraham, and was then extended to his son Isaac as part of God's promise to Abraham, according to Bible commentaries....
Circumcision, specifically Brit Milah, is a central ritual in Judaism, signifying a covenant between God and the Jewish people. It's performed on male infants eight days after birth as a religious obligation and a sign of this covenant, as described in the Torah.
17-07-2025, 09:32 PM
17-07-2025, 09:35 PM
(17-07-2025, 09:32 PM)pinkpanther Wrote: The circumcision covenant was initially made with Abraham, and was then extended to his son Isaac as part of God's promise to Abraham, according to Bible commentaries....
Circumcision, specifically Brit Milah, is a central ritual in Judaism, signifying a covenant between God and the Jewish people. It's performed on male infants eight days after birth as a religious obligation and a sign of this covenant, as described in the Torah.
Isaac wasn't an Israelite.
There is no initial and later. The covenant of circumcision was made with Abraham and extended to his descendants. Period.
It didn't say later that Ishmael is excluded or anything like that.
17-07-2025, 09:39 PM
(17-07-2025, 09:32 PM)pinkpanther Wrote: Yes...the followers are israelites but there are gentiles too..
That was disputed. Why was there a dispute on this issue? Because of the words of Jesus being "sent only to the Israelites".
I suspect, the dispute was the reason why the author of Matthew invented that great commission verse, to include the gentiles.
17-07-2025, 09:39 PM
No, Jesus did not command his followers to be circumcised. While Jesus himself was circumcised as a Jewish male, early Christian leaders, particularly Paul, argued against circumcision as a requirement for Gentile converts. The Council of Jerusalem, as recorded in Acts 15, decided that gentile Christians did not need to be circumcised. Instead, baptism became the primary outward sign of the Christian covenant.
As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly
17-07-2025, 09:41 PM
Jesus did not command his followers to abstain from eating pork. While the Old Testament, specifically the Book of Leviticus, lists pork as an unclean animal and prohibits its consumption by Jewish people, Jesus, in the New Testament, is presented as declaring all foods clean.
As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly
17-07-2025, 09:44 PM
(17-07-2025, 09:39 PM)Lukongsimi Wrote: No, Jesus did not command his followers to be circumcised.
Jesus did not need to command his followers to be circumcised because circumcision was already instituted long before the time of Jesus.
Jesus also said, "keep the commandments". That would include circumcision.
17-07-2025, 09:46 PM
Yes, Isaac is considered one of the three main patriarchs of the Israelites, alongside his father Abraham and his son Jacob. Isaac is the son of Abraham and Sarah, and the father of Jacob and Esau
As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly
17-07-2025, 09:46 PM
(17-07-2025, 09:44 PM)Ali Imran Wrote: Jesus did not need to command his followers to be circumcised because circumcision was already instituted long before the time of Jesus.Where?
Jesus also said, "keep the commandments". That would include circumcision.
As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 28 Guest(s)