[pinkpanther]

Why did the modern Bible throw out that verse?

It wasn't me or any Muslims who threw it out. Bible scholars did.

That is why I ask you!
Do you know more than the Blibical scholars?

[Ali Imran]

That is why I ask you!
Do you know more than the Blibical scholars?

Already answered you but you didn't read, as usual. For the last time, I don't know better than Bible scholars. I refer to them. They are the people who told us about the corruption in the Bible.

[Ali Imran]

No .it just to show that Muhammad is not able to show mercy.  .. the killing of the ịnnocent civilians, women and kids were sold as slaves..is this what Allah commands him to do?

Only the guilty were put to death.

And the ruling by the judge coincides with Deuteronomy 20:12-14.

[pinkpanther]

Only the guilty were put to death.

And the ruling by the judge coincides with Deuteronomy 20:12-14.

No..only those who were judged to have pubic hairs were executed...  that is the criteria....who is there to do the checking? Muhammad!

[Ali Imran]

Now the mocking starts.

[Lukongsimi]

You're the liar for calling me a liar without proof.

Moslem are liars to trick people into their religion that is very popular in the internet
They don’t accept the ugly side of their book

[Lukongsimi]

No..only those who were judged to have pubic hairs were executed...  that is the criteria....who is there to do the checking? Muhammad!

So need a clean Botak bird 🦅?

[Ali Imran]

Moslem are liars to trick people into their religion that is very popular in the internet
They don’t accept the ugly side of their book

Yeah.. the internet is always telling the truth.

You're beyond gullible.

[Lukongsimi]

Yeah.. the internet is always telling the truth.

You're beyond gullible.

Without the internet people are unaware what the truth lies

[pinkpanther]

Already answered you but you didn't read, as usual. For the last time, I don't know better than Bible scholars. I refer to them. They are the people who told us about the corruption in the Bible.

Sir Lionel Luckhoo

[pinkpanther]

Now the mocking starts.

[Ali Imran]

Sir Lionel Luckhoo

You're replying to my post about the findings of Bible scholars on the fallibility of the Bible.

Your post is irrelevant.

[pinkpanther]

So need a clean Botak bird 🦅?

 if the bird has any feathers, its head will be chop off....

Life and death is dependent on a strand of pubic hair

[Ali Imran]

And the mocking resumes.

[pinkpanther]

Already answered you but you didn't read, as usual. For the last time, I don't know better than Bible scholars. I refer to them. They are the people who told us about the corruption in the Bible.

Who says there are corruption in the Bible? Even moslem scholars shown by Lksm have all attest to the uncorrupted Bible.

[Ali Imran]

Who says there are corruption in the Bible? 

Bible scholars say.

[pinkpanther]

Bible scholars say.

Vast majority of Biblical scholars do not agree with you...do you know better than them?

[pinkpanther]

And the mocking resumes.

A time travel back in time with some shavers will definitely save plenty of lives

[Ali Imran]

Vast majority of Biblical scholars do not agree with you...do you know better than them?

Are you sure about the vast majority?

Let's take the leading scholar of the New Testament, Bart Ehrman. Did he agree that there are corruptions in the NT?

[Ali Imran]

A time travel back in time with some shavers will definitely save plenty of lives

When you've lost the debate, you will begin mocking.

[pinkpanther]

When you've lost the debate, you will begin mocking.

Lost what debate? What is a discussion without some jokes

[pinkpanther]

Are you sure about the vast majority?

Let's take the leading scholar of the New Testament, Bart Ehrman. Did he agree that there are corruptions in the NT?

Wesley Huff a blibical scholar says in his statement that there is no corruption in the Bible aligns with a perspective held by many believers who view the scriptures as divinely inspired and preserved without error

[Ali Imran]

Wesley Huff a blibical scholar says in his statement that there is no corruption in the Bible aligns with a perspective held by many believers who view the scriptures as divinely inspired and preserved without error

When Matthew removed the most important commandment that is found in Mark, is that a corruption according to you?

[pinkpanther]

When Matthew removed the most important commandment that is found in Mark, is that a corruption according to you?

Do you know better than the scholars?
The omission in Matthew could be seen as a subtle shift in emphasis or a deliberate editing choice.

[Ali Imran]

Do you know better than the scholars?
The omission in Matthew could be seen as a subtle shift in emphasis or a deliberate editing choice.

When the author of Matthew deliberately removed the words of Jesus according to Mark, did he corrupt the answer given by Jesus?

[pinkpanther]

When the author of Matthew deliberately removed the words of Jesus according to Mark, did he corrupt the answer given by Jesus?

Do you know the author's intent? If you don know, don jump to your own conclusion

[Ali Imran]

Do you know the author's intent? If you don know, don jump to your own conclusion

No, I do not know the author's intent. But when you changed the answer given by Jesus according to Mark, that is a corruption.

That's not the only 1. There are more like that.

[pinkpanther]

No, I do not know the author's intent. But when you changed the answer given by Jesus according to Mark, that is a corruption.

That's not the only 1. There are more like that.

Nonsense . There is no scholar that would put his head down and say this is a complete corruption..
If you don know, don pretend to be a scholar

[Ali Imran]

Nonsense . There is no scholar that would put his head down and say this is a complete corruption..
If you don know, don pretend to be a scholar

No, I didn't say it is a complete corruption.

I'm only showing you where the author of Matthew changed the answer given by Jesus according to Mark.

[pinkpanther]

No, I didn't say it is a complete corruption.

I'm only showing you where the author of Matthew changed the answer given by Jesus according to Mark.

OK .then it is no corruption.