Just vote for TKL lor.
Why I won't vote for Tharman ...and you also shouldn't
19-08-2023, 12:22 PM
Unless you prefer a coin with two faces, there isn't any value to vote in Tharman. Lol
Just vote for TKL lor.
Just vote for TKL lor.
19-08-2023, 01:03 PM
(19-08-2023, 10:19 AM)Bluebull Wrote: Not only he’s a jhkWhy wud I want a person who is not a singaporean born to interfere with our internal family affairs? His roots are not even here.
His wife is Indonesian
His business partners and business sponsors are Australians
And he’s beholden to them
Pinky probably knows that, and fee.s he’s to dangerous to National Security
So he look for a reason to bar him
Actually, looking at the PE eligibility criteria, he should qualify
I hv to think thrice voting for such person.
19-08-2023, 04:52 PM
We need to treat this PE like a Single-Member Constituency (SMC) for the whole freaking country with PAP (+Estab) vs Independent (Opposition).
Ironically this PE is our one and only hope to vote against the PAP. for whole country.
PAP keep trying to use the main media to say that the president must be 'Unifying people' and above politics etc. But is actually pure Bullshit. If PAP is really sincere to make it non-political then they would have set rules to prevent anyone who are members of any political party for past 5 yrs for e.g. to stand for election. Then Tharman would be banned and not endorsed by the PM to run.
So in fact PAP is the one making it political while technically only appearing apolitical under the law, LOL. What hypocrisy.
Bearing in mind that besides custodial powers, the President can also push and champion for many social causes which are intrinsically linked to PAP-Gov policies. Forget about how the main media cleverly omitting the mentioning of social causes but keep harping about about the president's custodial powers like a puppet as if the position is strictly non-political, LOL.
Halimah and all past PAP puppet presidents did not push hard enough on these 'social causes', only TKL will be the one to push it to the limits within his presidential powers to influence Gov policies esp. on costs of living, for e.g. related to high HDB costs due to PAP-Gov force-feeding commoners to pay land cost to SLA for the reserves but don't give them a strata title which is totally ridiculous, LOL.
Unlike GE whereby opposition parties are divided and conquered across multiple wards with mediocre candidates, TKL has been declared as a person of integrity, good character and reputation by PEC. So the credibility part is taken out as all candidates qualified for the post.
Question now is does Sinkies want to continue blaming the '61%' for voting PAP into power? Or are they able to wake up to know the importance of voting against the establishment?
Regardless of whether Tharman or NKS is more qualified for the post and can speak better to rep Singapore overseas or not, voters must be obsolutely clear about their objective of voting this time round. Else since Tharman is most qualified with stellar international standings and so on, might as well not have a contest and make him the president, LOL.
Hence it's paramount that TKL must become the president and once Tharman loses the presidency, means wat?
It will become unprecedented, PAP will panic and shit in their pants wondering what the fark happened.
Most importantly, it means we are sending a strong middle-finger signal to PAP that many commoners are not happy with their policies and they must not continue to take GE voters for granted. This paves way for better quality opposition candidates to step forward in next GE.
One small step at a time folks, but this is the most crucial step. Else PAP will remain in power at least for the next 50 years. You want that to happen?
It's now or never.
Ironically this PE is our one and only hope to vote against the PAP. for whole country.
PAP keep trying to use the main media to say that the president must be 'Unifying people' and above politics etc. But is actually pure Bullshit. If PAP is really sincere to make it non-political then they would have set rules to prevent anyone who are members of any political party for past 5 yrs for e.g. to stand for election. Then Tharman would be banned and not endorsed by the PM to run.
So in fact PAP is the one making it political while technically only appearing apolitical under the law, LOL. What hypocrisy.
Bearing in mind that besides custodial powers, the President can also push and champion for many social causes which are intrinsically linked to PAP-Gov policies. Forget about how the main media cleverly omitting the mentioning of social causes but keep harping about about the president's custodial powers like a puppet as if the position is strictly non-political, LOL.
Halimah and all past PAP puppet presidents did not push hard enough on these 'social causes', only TKL will be the one to push it to the limits within his presidential powers to influence Gov policies esp. on costs of living, for e.g. related to high HDB costs due to PAP-Gov force-feeding commoners to pay land cost to SLA for the reserves but don't give them a strata title which is totally ridiculous, LOL.
Unlike GE whereby opposition parties are divided and conquered across multiple wards with mediocre candidates, TKL has been declared as a person of integrity, good character and reputation by PEC. So the credibility part is taken out as all candidates qualified for the post.
Question now is does Sinkies want to continue blaming the '61%' for voting PAP into power? Or are they able to wake up to know the importance of voting against the establishment?
Regardless of whether Tharman or NKS is more qualified for the post and can speak better to rep Singapore overseas or not, voters must be obsolutely clear about their objective of voting this time round. Else since Tharman is most qualified with stellar international standings and so on, might as well not have a contest and make him the president, LOL.
Hence it's paramount that TKL must become the president and once Tharman loses the presidency, means wat?
It will become unprecedented, PAP will panic and shit in their pants wondering what the fark happened.
Most importantly, it means we are sending a strong middle-finger signal to PAP that many commoners are not happy with their policies and they must not continue to take GE voters for granted. This paves way for better quality opposition candidates to step forward in next GE.
One small step at a time folks, but this is the most crucial step. Else PAP will remain in power at least for the next 50 years. You want that to happen?
It's now or never.
19-08-2023, 09:14 PM
People like him because he is a sweet talker.
Win the World but lost your Soul.
19-08-2023, 09:22 PM
(19-08-2023, 04:52 PM)lioncityftw Wrote: We need to treat this PE like a Single-Member Constituency (SMC) for the whole freaking country with PAP (+Estab) vs Independent (Opposition).
Ironically this PE is our one and only hope to vote against the PAP. for whole country.
PAP keep trying to use the main media to say that the president must be 'Unifying people' and above politics etc. But is actually pure Bullshill. If PAP is really sincere to make it non-political then they would have set rules to prevent anyone who are members of any political party for past 5 yrs for e.g. to stand for election. Then Tharman would be banned and not endorsed by the PM to run.
So in fact PAP is the one making it political while technically only appearing apolitical under the law, LOL. What hypocrisy.
Not forgetting that besides custodial powers, the President can also push and champion for many social causes which are intrinsically linked to PAP-Gov policies. Forget about how the main media cleverly omitting the mentioning of social causes but keep harping about about the president's custodial powers like a puppet as if the position is strictly non-political, LOL.
Halimah and all past PAP puppet presidents did not push hard enough on these 'social causes', only TKL will be the one to push it to the limits within his presidential powers to influence Gov policies esp. on costs of living, for e.g. related to high HDB costs due to PAP-Gov force-feeding commoners to pay land cost to SLA for the reserves but don't give them a strata title which is totally ridiculous, LOL.
Unlike GE whereby opposition parties are divided and conquered across multiple wards with mediocre candidates, TKL has been declared as a person of integrity, good character and reputation by PEC. So the credibility part is taken out as all candidates qualified for the post.
Question now is does Sinkies want to continue blaming the '61%' for voting PAP into power? Or are they able to wake up to know the importance of voting against the establishment?
Regardless of whether Tharman or NKS is more qualified for the post and can speak better to rep Singapore overseas or not, voters must be obsoletely clear about their objective of voting this time round. Else since Tharman is most qualified with stellar international standings and so on, might as well not have a contest and make him the president, LOL.
Hence it's paramount that TKL must become the president and once Tharman loses the presidency, means wat?
It will become unprecedented, PAP will panic and shit in their pants wondering what the fark happened.
Most importantly, it means we are sending a strong middle-finger signal to PAP that many commoners are not happy with their policies and they must not continue to take GE voters for granted. This paves way for better quality opposition candidates to step forward in next GE.
One small step at a time folks, but this is the most crucial step. Else PAP will remain in power at least for the next 50 years. You want that to happen?
It's now or never.
Go and reply to this Moonrab, a PAP plp all these years, I have been monitoring her
https://sgtalk.net/Thread-Let-me-explain...#pid689156
And "obsoletely" is typo error
19-08-2023, 09:23 PM
Looks like tkl is the only one, although not the best, not very well liked, and not very smart
19-08-2023, 09:35 PM
(19-08-2023, 09:23 PM)WhatDoYouThink! Wrote: Looks like tkl is the only one, although not the best, not very well liked, and not very smartNo need a perfectionist as so far almost all the past presidents are practically doing nothing of value to the people. TKL is not going to be the diam diam type of president that will just wave hand. Change will be good as he promise to do more to work with the govt but not as their puppet. Vote the other 2 and for sure nothing changes.
20-08-2023, 06:24 AM
20-08-2023, 06:28 AM
40% lives in Africa 2100 means many many will die.
20-08-2023, 06:30 AM
20-08-2023, 06:32 AM
Thambi is being directed to sit on the presidential chair.
The smell of sotong is so strong
still playing on one hand ON the other?
The Other sotong is Emergency spare TIRE
The smell of sotong is so strong
still playing on one hand ON the other?
The Other sotong is Emergency spare TIRE
20-08-2023, 06:54 AM
19-04-2024, 04:02 PM
19-04-2024, 04:07 PM
(13-08-2023, 11:17 AM)sgbuffett Wrote: While some Singaporeans have a good impression of him resulting from his calm and steady demeanour and highly articulate speech, I have a very different view of the man.Did he also initiated GST and its subsequent hiking
The lack of independence alone is enough for people not to vote for him. .and they shouldn't.
For people here in market talk many are investors and there are specific reasons for us not to support him.
To me Tharman all along was overrated for the following reasons
1. Being in Minstry in charge of the sgx he failed to prevent listing of fraudulent companies like s chips, oil exploration stocks and failed to tighten regulation.
2. Lehman minibinds happened under his watch when banks engaged in selling products disallowed in other countries. Why did MAS allow it?
3. He refuse to implement important parts of the Sarbines Oxley Act to prevent fraud and improve accountability of listed companies ....all major developed countries adopted this like Japan and US and the level of fraud is a tiny fraction of Singapore we have a small stock exchange but many fraud and bankruptcy cases.
4. Failure to revamp CPFIS scheme to give retirement accounts to low cost products instead of UT.
What has Tharman done in his 20yrs to improve the investment environment in Singapore as Finance minister and when he headed MAS.
19-04-2024, 04:09 PM
19-04-2024, 04:12 PM
(19-04-2024, 04:09 PM)Tee tiong huat Wrote: Hope somethings good coming for this Thambi. He is one of the best we has.
When "one of the best" is so politically aligned with the govt, then he won't look out for the interests of the people. It is really as simple as that. We don't need another puppet.
![[Image: President.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/ssxdcqy/President.jpg)
20-04-2024, 10:51 AM
No.
I didn't vote for any fruit or vegetable.
I didn't vote for any fruit or vegetable.
20-04-2024, 10:53 AM
20-04-2024, 11:36 AM
Whoever they are, as long as they are MIWs, they wil not be my choice.
20-04-2024, 12:19 PM
SGbuffet posted no wonder the result reversed with his tremendous voters....😅
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)