(15-12-2021, 08:49 PM)forum456 Wrote:  https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/people-who-take-sinovac-vaccine-at-higher-risk-of-severe-disease-ncid-study

(15-12-2021, 09:34 PM)debono Wrote:  So those who took the mRNA-based Pfizer-BioNTech are in a better position to be protected against the Covid-19 viruses.....

Quote:..... The remaining 2.4 per cent had been vaccinated with Sinovac.

(15-12-2021, 09:42 PM)lionkingch55 Wrote:  china is in deep shit now. They jab hundred of millions with sinovac!

(15-12-2021, 09:42 PM)lionkingch55 Wrote:  china is in deep shit now. They jab hundred of millions with sinovac!

(15-12-2021, 09:49 PM)RichDad Wrote:  Effectiveness is very subjective and hard to measure especially when the sample size is not big.. Anyway 3 jabs of Sinovac is good enough. At least the side effects are not as bad as mRNA.

Quote:The levels of neutralizing antibodies against Omicron with a recombinant adenovirus vector dose as a booster after two inactivated ones are 10 times higher than those achieved when taking three doses of an inactivated vaccine, CanSinoBIO stressed.

(15-12-2021, 10:13 PM)Galilo_l Wrote:  Oh so many deaths have occurred n they r vaccinated with sinovac? Nope it's due to underlying conditions!

(15-12-2021, 10:16 PM)watchfirst9 Wrote:  Severe disease are equal to death.
Average age taking sinovac is older than P & M, I believe,
elderly response to vaccine is known to be slower and weaker.

(15-12-2021, 10:14 PM)sgxin Wrote:  3 jabs of Sinovac/pham will be ok if one does not take off mask in public.
If one has exposure to high risk environment like food centres, getting the CanSino inhalation vaccine will be much better.
But Doubt Spore will import it, so I will travel to Malaysia or Thailand if it is available there.

For older folks who will likely have lower immunity or those travelling, a better and even safer option will be to get the new monoclonol antibodies drug from (Chinese) Brii Biosciences. I believe the use of this highly effective drug should be the reason for the very low severe cases (O2 supplementation & ICU) in China recent outbreaks. An injection can provide protection for up to 9 months. I guess it should be cheaper than Regeneron.

China’s CanSinoBIO vaccine can offer effective protection against Omicron: company
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202112/1241492.shtml

(15-12-2021, 10:25 PM)RiseofAsia Wrote:  炒冷饭

Most important thing it is a safe vaccine…
Till now, you still believe vaccine is effective. I think mask is more effective than vaccine.

(15-12-2021, 10:20 PM)sgxin Wrote:  Yes, I also believe the average age of Sinovac recipients in Spore are much older than that of the mRNA vaccines.

(15-12-2021, 10:20 PM)sgxin Wrote:  Yes, I also believe the average age of Sinovac recipients in Spore are much older than that of the mRNA vaccines.

(15-12-2021, 10:30 PM)Tangsen Wrote:  Regardless Ang Moh jab or PRCunts jab …. just jab which one you comfortable with lah … india variant still around now his rudder Omircon already joined in liow.
Address the clear present danger not worry about possible potential future danger
Go get your booster too

(15-12-2021, 10:34 PM)RiseofAsia Wrote:  Why you so kancheong, I tot EU mentioned 9mth. Don’t be a kancheong spider?

You are putting virus into your body not vitamin or nutrient…
Can drag better drag longer?

Angmoh vaccines are so "fantastic"! 

(15-12-2021, 09:49 PM)RichDad Wrote:  Effectiveness is very subjective and hard to measure especially when the sample size is not big.. Anyway 3 jabs of Sinovac is good enough. At least the side effects are not as bad as mRNA.

(15-12-2021, 08:49 PM)forum456 Wrote:  https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/people-who-take-sinovac-vaccine-at-higher-risk-of-severe-disease-ncid-study

(15-12-2021, 10:20 PM)sgxin Wrote:  Yes, I also believe the average age of Sinovac recipients in Spore are much older than that of the mRNA vaccines.

(15-12-2021, 10:25 PM)RiseofAsia Wrote:  炒冷饭

Most important thing it is a traditional and safe vaccine…
Till now, you still believe vaccine is effective. I think mask is more effective than vaccine.

If MRNA vaccine is so effective, how come our dear garment never asks us to remove the mask?

(16-12-2021, 06:17 AM)revealer Wrote:  One can avoid being infected.  The best is to always hibernate at home or in a faraway or isolated land.  But one cannot avoid severely sick or death when one is infected



Chart from :https://skyjuiceiswater.blogspot.com/2021/10/why-vaccinated-has-higher-rate-of.html

(16-12-2021, 06:17 AM)revealer Wrote:  One can avoid being infected.  The best is to always hibernate at home or in a faraway or isolated land.  But one cannot avoid severely sick or death when one is infected



Chart from :https://skyjuiceiswater.blogspot.com/2021/10/why-vaccinated-has-higher-rate-of.html

(15-12-2021, 09:34 PM)debono Wrote:  So those who took the mRNA-based Pfizer-BioNTech are in a better position to be protected against the Covid-19 viruses.....

(16-12-2021, 06:00 AM)Sentinel Wrote:  Hey forum dumbasses, this study already said conducted in Oct-Nov 2021 and when Delta is dominant strain in Sg

This is sleight of hand study to justify stupiak and incompetent PAP MOH mistake of jabbing everyone they can kelong to jab mRNA

Slow lah, now the world is talking abt Omicron and NCID is still stuck in the cave of Delta

The study was based on the original Wild variant of Covid 19, not even Delta variant and they are trying to fool us that this applies to Delta when even now we hv moved ahead to Omicron liao

It is an evolving fact that mRNA is much less effective than inactivated virus vaccine against Delta, but these conniving NCID bastards chose to sidestep this fact

Moving ahead, it would be sensible to drop mRNA altogether and instead embrace inactivated vaccine as it has better effectiveness against Omicron variant whereas mRNA effectiveness drop to zero as more variants beyond Omicron could possibly mutate its spike protein even further until even the b cell has zero memory, rendering mRNA a total dud

Besides, the bad scientific press of unknown deadly mid to long term side effects of this experimental gene therapy mRNA still not refuted successfully yet because it is most possibly true that mRNA can cause cancer, ADE, diabetes, heart inflammation, blood clots, etec, etc in the mid to long term

Heavens have eyes one lah

Everyday this PAP MOH NCID is not brought to their knees to admit to their aweful mistake and investment greed to pick mRNA, Heavens will never rest one lah

You guys who stupiakly jabbed mRNA despite all the warning signs you hv been privy to, there are only three words for you: Serves You Right!