Posts: 12,654
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 3,368 in 3,038 posts
Likes Given: 2,719
Pray 5 times should not call people ostrich or scold with foul words
Don’t u agree
That is not Jesus teachings
Should follow Jesus don’t argue just walk away
Jesus teaches love forgiveness
2 very important commandments given
love your God with all your heart mind and soul
Love your Neighbour as yourself
Without love that is impossible to enter heaven
Heaven is light n sin is darkness can’t enter without Christ and removal of sin and repentance
Not gg to argue with unbelievers waste time either
U believe or not up to u
Choice is yours
I
Have make my choice and m happy
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you also be like him" (Proverbs 26:4)
>
(This post was last modified: 06-02-2025, 10:52 AM by
Lukongsimi.)
Posts: 8,004
   
Threads: 200
    
Likes Received: 2,212 in 1,877 posts
Likes Given: 1,085
1.N.T. Wright - A prominent New Testament scholar and former Bishop of Durham, Wright argues that the Gospels provide a trustworthy account of Jesus's life and the early Christian movement. He emphasizes historical context and the importance of understanding the cultural environment of first-century Judea.
2.Craig Blomberg - A New Testament scholar known for his defense of the historical reliability of the Gospels. Blomberg argues that the Gospels meet criteria of historical reliability through multiple attestation, early dating, and their coherence with historical context.
3.Richard Bauckham - In his book "Jesus and the Eyewitnesses," Bauckham argues that the Gospels are based on the testimony of eyewitnesses. His work emphasizes the importance of oral tradition and how it contributes to the Gospels' reliability.
4.Gary Habermas - A scholar specializing in the historical Jesus and the resurrection, Habermas argues that the core claims about Jesus's life and resurrection are supported by early and reliable sources, including the Gospels.
5.William Lane Craig - A philosopher and theologian, Craig defends the historical reliability of the New Testament documents, including the Gospels, particularly in the context of the resurrection of Jesus.
6.John A.T. Robinson - In his book "Redating the New Testament," Robinson argues for an early dating of the Gospels, which he believes contributes to their reliability as historical documents.
Posts: 12,654
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 3,368 in 3,038 posts
Likes Given: 2,719
(06-02-2025, 10:45 AM)pinkpanther Wrote: How can a dead person stop you from reaching out to God? The Moslem God wants you to give credit to Muhammad before you pray to Him.....Only Islam puts a dead higher than God? 
Agreed
Only God can open our eyes and see the truth
lol
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you also be like him" (Proverbs 26:4)
>
Posts: 8,004
   
Threads: 200
    
Likes Received: 2,212 in 1,877 posts
Likes Given: 1,085
Academics who have critiqued the Quran from a historical or literary perspective:
1.Juan Cole (b. 1951) - An American historian, Cole has written extensively on Middle Eastern history and culture. While not a critic of Islam per se, he has argued that the Quran's historical accounts are often unreliable and that the book contains many contradictions.
Fred Donner (b. 1946) - An American historian, Donner has written on the early history of Islam and the Quran. He has argued that the book's accounts of historical events are often based on oral tradition and are therefore unreliable.
Michael Cook (b. 1940) - A British historian, Cook has written on the history of Islam and the Quran. He has argued that the book's language and style are typical of 7th-century Arabic literature.
Andrew Rippin (b. 1944) - A Canadian historian, Rippin has written extensively on the Quran and its history. He has argued that the book's accounts of historical events are often based on oral tradition and are therefore unreliable.
Harald Motzki (1947-2017) - A German historian, Motzki was a prominent scholar of the Quran's history and transmission. He argued that the book's language and style are often inconsistent and that its claims about divine revelation are unsubstantiated
Posts: 3,837
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 208 in 201 posts
Likes Given: 61
(06-02-2025, 10:50 AM)Lukongsimi Wrote: Pray 5 times should not call people ostrich or scold with foul words
Don’t u agree
That is not Jesus teachings
Should follow Jesus don’t argue just walk away
Jesus teaches love forgiveness
2 very important commandments given
love your God with all your heart mind and soul
Love your Neighbour as yourself
Without love that is impossible to enter heaven
Heaven is light n sin is darkness can’t enter without Christ and removal of sin and repentance
Not gg to argue with unbelievers waste time either
U believe or not up to u
Choice is yours
I
Have make my choice and m happy
In the Gospels, Jesus called people worst names, like vipers and such.
You ignore the words of Jesus like an ostrich hiding its head in the sand.
Jesus said, the most important commandment is the Shema, which you have broken. Jesus said to pray only to the Father but you pray to Jesus instead. Jesus said the only true God is the Father but you add 2 more gods. Jesus said to obey the Law but you discarded them.
(This post was last modified: 06-02-2025, 10:59 AM by
Ali Imran.)
Posts: 3,837
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 208 in 201 posts
Likes Given: 61
(06-02-2025, 10:55 AM)Lukongsimi Wrote: Agreed
Only God can open our eyes and see the truth
lol
If a man goes to your church and says he believes in Jesus and requests to be baptized, will your church people say "You cannot be baptized. Must study the Bible for more than a year first."?
Or did your friend pinky lied?
Posts: 8,004
   
Threads: 200
    
Likes Received: 2,212 in 1,877 posts
Likes Given: 1,085
Allah calls the Jews and Christians the worst of creatures.....what is vipers? Nothing!
Since He created the Jews and Christians...Is he the Father of the worst creatures according to Islam?