[Tee tiong huat]

€100 Billion for Ukraine.

€100,000,000,000 for Ukraine.

Nearer and nearer to Moscow...

[Tee tiong huat]

Ukraine are using long-range drone, the FP-1, with striking range of 1,600 km (approximately 1,000 miles). Drone is designed for strikes deep into enemy territory and can carry a warhead of up to 120 kilograms. While there's no evidence of a drone with a 6,000 km range, But Ukraine has been actively developing newer upto 3,000 km range testing various long-range drones to Germany in join production (Joint venture) in Ukraine. Some has been fly beyond Moscow.

[Tee tiong huat]

Ukraine are using long-range drone, the FP-1, with striking range of 1,600 km (approximately 1,000 miles). Drone is designed for strikes deep into enemy territory and can carry a warhead of up to 120 kilograms. While there's no evidence of a drone with a 6,000 km range, But Ukraine has been actively developing newer upto 3,000 km range testing various long-range drones to Germany in join production (Joint venture) in Ukraine. Some has been fly beyond Moscow.

For eg: A Tomahawk detonating above a jet during testing in 1986. A 5.5-meter-long missile is fitted with a warhead weighing nearly half a ton can fly around 1,600 kilometers. Here Is What Missiles Drone could >>>Do For Ukraine> https://share.google/fAbQ2OpKrhXU2UVXN

[Tee tiong huat]

For eg: A Tomahawk detonating above a jet during testing in 1986. A 5.5-meter-long missile is fitted with a warhead weighing nearly half a ton can fly around 1,600 kilometers. Here Is What Missiles Drone could >>>Do For Ukraine> https://share.google/fAbQ2OpKrhXU2UVXN

Ukraine can used, but all this can't fly beyond Moscow...

[Tee tiong huat]

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz signaled openness to lifting former Chancellor Olaf Scholz's ban on missiles. Stance now included join producing of long-range missiles resulted in a policy shift. As Ukraine already not only received long-range missiles — eg: ATACMS, but also Storm Shadow & SCALP from U.K. & France. Now Ukraine is making own drones missiles that can reach 3,000 km, reaching KAZAN).

[Tee tiong huat]

Currently Ukraine 7th Ukraine president
Zelensky is call for more weapons to stop Putin Ukraine/Russia war. He's 7th Ukrainian president. Will he be able to save his country from disaster,” but around year 2027 years later?.

(Baba Vanga) The late Baba is saying to have predicted peace talk would reach in 2027. Only 8th Ukrainian president can save Ukraine.

[Tee tiong huat]

She prophesied that humans would come into contact with extraterrestrials in the year 2025, and that the event would likely coincide with a “major sporting event.” Though a few of the year’s most notable games and championships have already occurred — Wimbledon, the Super Bowl and the NBA playoffs, to name a few — the year is only halfway over, so there are still plenty of rowdy sporting events to draw extraterrestrial visitors in. Athos Salomé — also known as Living Nostradamus, after 15th-century French astrologer seer of the same name — also predicted humanity can cross alien contact off its bucket list at some point this year.

https://youtu.be/SG2v2Y0wsp8?si=Mb_cT-PhmC5wxWdm

[Tee tiong huat]

At dawn on June 24, 2025, a Russian landing craft loaded with troops raced toward Kherson’s shore—completely unaware it had been tracked for 27 minutes by a Bayraktar TB2 drone orbiting 18,000 feet above. What followed wasn’t just another drone strike. It was a surgical elimination of a Russian special operations team, caught mid-mission and carrying demolition gear intended for targets deep in Ukrainian territory. Using a laser-guided MAM-L missile, the TB2 struck with pinpoint precision, destroying the vessel in seconds. But the real story came after the explosion. Debris revealed not only elite personnel but sabotage equipment. Within hours, Russian vessels retreated, missions were canceled, and encrypted orders flooded the airwaves. Ukraine’s drone operators didn’t just stop an amphibious assault—they shattered Russian confidence in their own secrecy. In this detailed breakdown, we cover the strike from first detection to final detonation, explore the strategic ripple effects, and show how one unmanned aircraft forced the Black Sea Fleet into full retreat. Subscribe for real-time combat analysis, modern drone warfare breakdowns, and the tactical edge defining today’s battle space.

[Tee tiong huat]

At dawn on June 24, 2025, a Russian landing craft loaded with troops raced toward Kherson’s shore—completely unaware it had been tracked for 27 minutes by a Bayraktar TB2 drone orbiting 18,000 feet above. What followed wasn’t just another drone strike. It was a surgical elimination of a Russian special operations team, caught mid-mission and carrying demolition gear intended for targets deep in Ukrainian territory. Using a laser-guided MAM-L missile, the TB2 struck with pinpoint precision, destroying the vessel in seconds. But the real story came after the explosion. Debris revealed not only elite personnel but sabotage equipment. Within hours, Russian vessels retreated, missions were canceled, and encrypted orders flooded the airwaves. Ukraine’s drone operators didn’t just stop an amphibious assault—they shattered Russian confidence in their own secrecy. In this detailed breakdown, we cover the strike from first detection to final detonation, explore the strategic ripple effects, and show how one unmanned aircraft forced the Black Sea Fleet into full retreat. Subscribe for real-time combat analysis, modern drone warfare breakdowns, and the tactical edge defining today’s battle space.

https://youtube.com/shorts/xs8uw_x8LrY?s...j1TzPkQY4c

[Tee tiong huat]

At dawn June 24, 2025, a landing craft loaded with troops raced toward Kherson’s shore—completely unaware it had been tracked for 27 minutes by a Bayraktar TB2 drone orbiting 18,000 feet above followed wasn’t just another drone strike. It was a surgical elimination at Russian special ops enemy team, caught mid-mission carrying demolition gear intended for targets deep in Ukrainian territory.

Using a laser-guided MAM-L missile, the TB2 struck with pinpoint precision, destroying vessel in seconds. A real story came after boat explosion. Debris revealed not only elite soldiers 
but sabotage equipment. Within hours, Russian vessels retreated, missions and encrypted orders flooded the airwaves. Ukraine’s drone operators didn’t just stop this amphibious assault—they shattered Russian confidence in their own secrecy. In this detailed breakdown, we cover strike from first detection to final detonation, explore the strategic ripple effects, & show how unmanned aircraft forced the enemy Black Sea Fleet into full retreat. Subscribe for real-time combat analysis, modern drone warfare breakdowns, & the tactical edge defining today’s battle space.

https://youtu.be/C5rAWfIjiiI?si=PRx7VJ9uUd0IK4K0

[Tee tiong huat]

Defence secretary to call for ‘50-day drive’ >>arm Kyiv & force Putin’s hand.
It comes after US president Donald Trump gave Putin a 50 day deadline to agree to a ceasefire...

[Tee tiong huat]

Defence secretary to call for ‘50-day drive’ >>arm Kyiv & force Putin’s hand.
It comes after US president Donald Trump gave Putin a 50 day deadline to agree to a ceasefire...

The defence secretary will call for a 50-day drive to arm Ukraine when he chairs a meeting of Kyiv’s allies on Monday. Today is 21/7/2025...

[Tee tiong huat]

Here, the Russian armed forces ran out of tanks after months of reckless frontal assaults against fortified Ukrainian positions. The multi-layer Ukrainian defense destroyed thousands of Russian armored vehicles and depleted even the Soviet stockpiles that many thought were endless.

On July 8, the Ukrainian General Staff reported an extraordinary battlefield statistic: zero Russian tank losses. Rather than indicating a successful tactical shift, this unprecedented figure underscores Russia’s critical shortage of operational tanks. Russian units simply no longer possess enough tanks to risk losing them in frequent frontal assaults. Mechanized attacks, once the hallmark of Russian offensives, have nearly disappeared, replaced entirely by small-unit infantry actions and increasingly improvised tactics.

Months of relentless, suicidal assaults have decimated Russia’s armored capabilities. Especially in Donetsk and Toretsk, hundreds of Russian tanks have fallen easy prey to Ukrainian FPV drones, anti-tank guided missiles, artillery, and extensive minefields. This staggering attrition has far outpaced Russia's capacity to replace battlefield losses.

Uralvagonzavod, Russia’s main tank producer, can currently manufacture no more than 20 to 25 new T-90M tanks monthly. Even though Russia increased production slightly from about 17 tanks per month in 2023 to roughly 25 by 2025, this limited output remains negligible compared to ongoing combat losses. Additionally, Russia has historically relied heavily on refurbishing Soviet-era models from storage, such as T-72’s, T-80’s, and even older T-62’s and T-55’s. Yet refurbishment capabilities have dramatically declined as stocks of viable stored tanks dwindle. Previously able to restore about 80 to 100 tanks per month in 2023, this number has dropped significantly to approximately 30 to 35 per month by early 2025. As a result, Russian frontline units rarely deploy tanks unless it involves an isolated, high-priority operation.

In this new reality, Russia has shifted toward infantry-heavy assaults, often employing motorcycles, ATV’s, and improvised armored vehicles, sometimes mockingly termed "armored barns", to support infantry attacks. A recent example near Toretsk vividly demonstrates the futility of these desperate tactics: two such vehicles accompanied infantry attempting an assault but were swiftly neutralized by Ukrainian artillery and FPV drones, resulting in the complete annihilation of the attacking force. The dominant presence of Ukrainian drones and precision artillery fire has effectively rendered conventional mechanized warfare suicidal, compelling Russia to rely on these hazardous infantry-centric operations.

The few remaining Russian tanks are now treated as treasured commodities, rarely risked and repurposed into slow-moving, heavily armored mobile bunkers. These tanks are being outfitted with excessive improvised protection like multiple layers of metal cages, chains, slat armor, netting, mine plows, and even layers of scrap metal or wooden beams. While these alterations marginally improve survivability against drones and guided missiles, they severely diminish mobility, visibility, and offensive capability. The new "mega turtle tanks," as they have become sarcastically known, move sluggishly, are functionally blind, and extremely vulnerable to mines, even if it is somewhat harder to fully destroy with drones alone.

These desperate upgrades offer minimal strategic advantage. Although the mega turtle tanks survive slightly longer under drone attacks, their limited numbers and reduced combat effectiveness render them irrelevant for achieving operational breakthroughs especially being easily immobilized by mines. Footage of destroyed and abandoned "mega turtle" tanks clearly demonstrates that, despite absurd modifications, they fail to meaningfully shift battlefield dynamics.

Overall, Russia’s tank shortage, compounded by staggering losses and dwindling production, has fundamentally altered its battlefield strategy. The shift from mechanized assaults to infantry-focused operations and the use of makeshift armored vehicles highlights the extent of Russian desperation. Despite attempts at improvised tank upgrades, the lack of operational tanks and diminishing resources have crippled Russia’s offensive capabilities, making traditional warfare increasingly ineffective against Ukraine’s precision firepower and well-organized defense.
https://youtu.be/quifplfvngo?si=z8bQoqaNpPHd_Wcx