(24-07-2023, 05:31 PM)moonrab Wrote: Oh that one. I think family background is solid?
I know that her father is wealthy. If what you said is true, that means Singh is scared of rich peepur. Not a good quality to have for someone who's a LOTO because the things he fights for will be coloured by his fear.
I don't think it had to do with her "solid" family background.
Honestly, I don't believe the things both Singh and RK said for public consumption. Her being raped in London was another lie, just that there's no way to prove that it was a lie, now that she has given birth, and it happened so many years ago, and the "rapist" was some random stranger, and you can't tell the police now to arrest a stranger whom nobody can tell....which is which, who the eff that random stranger was.
Singh told the public that he had to give RK time to speak to her father and husband about her rape, so that's why he delayed. Boo sheet! She was a Member of Parliament but he portrayed her as a 15 year old schoolgirl, vulnerable and needing daddy's shoulders wor!
My foot man!
If he meant what he said about Pereira, he should have fired RK, father or no father. Oh wait, did he give Perira time so he could speak to his mother, and cry on her shoulders? Why he didn't give him time huh?
The "father" part was to go to him to tell him that they would be spinning a lie about RK being raped, so he would be kept in the loop and not be shocked, upset, whatever.
Singh had been informed about Rebecca and Pereira. Instead of hiring a PI to check on them, he went to ask them, is it true? By asking them, he effectively tipped them off...be careful, both of you, someone saw something hor...
Only when the beedio went viral on social media, he had no choice but to act. And claimed that he would have fired Pereira if he didn't resign.