[Oyk]

i agree totally wif what u said BUT nobody knows she is a SA victim until she lied in parliament. This is the real deal. If u think there is no diff betw someone who hid they r a SA victim for years vs someone who have been forced to expose publicly...then u r dead wrong.

i dunno.. i just have been very restless past few days..i hope the COP made the right conclusion.

Nobody knew she was "allegedly" a SA victim when:

1.  she stood for election last year.

2.  when she lied about CHC leaders, mosque leaders and rich Chinese

3.  when she lied in Parliament about the police and having escorted the victim to the police station.

Her supposedly ALLEGED SA did not for a second constrain her to do all of the above.

And suddenly. when she has to confess her lie in Parliament, her "alleged" SA became a big deal.

All she needed to say was:  I spoke about the police making some remarks about the victim's dressing.  I said I accompanied the victims to the police station.  I lied on both.

Finished.

What has her own SA case got to do with making such a simple confession?