[Bigiron]

PAP questions WP chief Pritam Singh for discussing Singapore politics 'on foreign soil, to foreign audience'

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapor...st-5218376

The PAP’s arguments in the article contain several logical flaws:

• False dichotomy: Framing foreign media engagement as inherently inappropriate.
  
• Appeal to patriotism: Implying unpatriotic behavior without evidence of harm.
  
• Guilt by association: Linking Singh’s podcast to unrelated foreign endorsements.
  
• Selective outrage: Ignoring similar engagements by PAP leaders.
  
• Argument from silence: Inferring complicity from Singh’s delayed response to endorsements.
  
• Hasty generalization: Accusing WP of racial politicking without substantiation.
  
• Vague assertion: Using “politics should stop at the water’s edge” without clear application.