24-03-2023, 08:04 AM
(24-03-2023, 07:58 AM)Sticw Wrote: I finally saw the debate clip. I think indeed it was rude to be answering the speaker that way. Whilst I do not agree with the way the min law had argued his way. There was so many if this and that and it's all judgement call.
As for the term made fugitive that lhy said, the made connotes accused but when you dropped the word made, then it seems like lhy admitted to the judgement that they lied or criminal.
Anyways I thought lmw was questioning the process and how the different treatment of when names were released. Not a debate on whether the persons are guilty or whatever. Min law used the word absconded to mean they ran from jurisdiction (but can have double meaning to suggest that indeed they admit to the crime, only God knows the truth in why the words were said the way it was).
Err... Genuine mistakes move on? Lol
Qns is why speaker asking the obvious : so does the six guilty or not guilty?
Plus min law vocabulary not good must ask lmw what is muddy the water in the parliament?
Why har ? Use iPad somemore cannot Google or use ChatGPT har
![[Image: IMG-20230324-080450-945.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/GHLyCR0/IMG-20230324-080450-945.jpg)