One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout
#8

(03-07-2023, 02:47 PM)[[ForeverAlone]] Wrote:  SG Army is " just for show ". Those serve NS will know Tongue  Serve and F OFF ...

come defending , are Those Regulars to be honest because they are full time soldier and been paid as Public servants thus obviously the front line is they go up to fight not the reservists. Honestly speaking, IF One day SG got war .  Is like Taiwan.  USA will come so call aid SG and Aust too since we have various training with them and use their place.


I once overheard another "NS man at the coffeeshop" that he will never defend SG since SG Army is "just for show".
I said "Thank you" to him as his enlistment of 2 years already in his tiny way serve a simple deterrence against Bolehland gov from breaking the 1962 Water Agreement at 0.01sen per 1000 gallon. So unlike the domestic affair in China, SG is a sovereign state with legitimate reason to take military actions based on UN law of self defense against those who threaten SG

Big Grin

[Image: water-goh-chok-tong.jpg]

You've got friendly neighbours? Grow Up! 李光耀 2013
Reply


Messages In This Thread
One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by TopSage - 03-07-2023, 02:13 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by ODA TETSURO - 03-07-2023, 02:41 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Ola - 03-07-2023, 02:42 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Manthink - 03-07-2023, 02:44 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by [[ForeverAlone]] - 03-07-2023, 02:47 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by WhatDoYouThink! - 03-07-2023, 03:16 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Manthink - 03-07-2023, 03:17 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Ola - 03-07-2023, 02:56 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Buffybuffy - 03-07-2023, 03:25 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Scythian - 03-07-2023, 03:32 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Manthink - 03-07-2023, 03:33 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by [[ForeverAlone]] - 03-07-2023, 03:37 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Niubee - 03-07-2023, 03:38 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by [[ForeverAlone]] - 03-07-2023, 03:40 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by pinkpanther - 03-07-2023, 03:46 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Manthink - 03-07-2023, 03:56 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by moonrab - 03-07-2023, 03:43 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Manthink - 03-07-2023, 03:59 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Migrant - 03-07-2023, 04:24 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Manthink - 03-07-2023, 05:25 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Scythian - 03-07-2023, 04:49 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by sgbuffett - 03-07-2023, 04:51 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Huliwang - 03-07-2023, 05:15 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Manthink - 03-07-2023, 05:28 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by pinkpanther - 03-07-2023, 05:17 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Manthink - 03-07-2023, 05:29 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by SeewhatLook - 03-07-2023, 05:31 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Manthink - 03-07-2023, 05:39 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Scythian - 03-07-2023, 05:40 PM
RE: One NS man said SG is not worth defending after ridout - by Ola - 03-07-2023, 05:57 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)