![](https://i.imgur.com/CLvY2jA.png")
10-07-2023, 05:42 PM
The reviewers did not investigate wrong doings lodged by complainants instead they defended the 2 accused up to the hilt with illusory charts and reports.
Did they review what should have and what should have not been done in order to avoid adverse public perception?
In conclusion, what was reviewed to prevent such incident from happening again in future?
Did they review what should have and what should have not been done in order to avoid adverse public perception?
In conclusion, what was reviewed to prevent such incident from happening again in future?
![[+]](https://sgtalk.net/images/bootbb/collapse_collapsed.png)
