[Blasterlord2]

In your last post, you went on about being able to obtain religious information from the Net with consummate ease, and you ended your post with a sentence saying, OKY "has definitely not lived up to his own preach..."

My reply was lengthy and relevant to the discussion at hand. Now your reply to me is a snappy "No need to talk so much." Feeling snappy with me, you changed the subject, asking me if I agree that it's okay to declare publicly that B & M need J. I'm afraid yours is a rhetorical question, so I won't answer it. Communication is a two-way process, and comments should be germane to the discussion.

My last line about him not living up to his preach is to solicit your opinion of him, whether it is right of him to use words to talk about other religions. So when you used a lot of words without commenting on this, obviously I asked you not to talk so much and get to the point, which to comment what you think of him when he said that "Buddha and Mohammad need Jesus". 

But actually I know what you will say, because that is your modus operandi. You'll say that you're not in a position to comment on his words, because it is for god to judge. In this way, you'll retain your neutrality. By not commenting, you've indeed revealed your "neutrality" lol.