[Oyk]

Deciding whether a person is guilty of committing a sacrilege in breach of a religious harmony law is not a simple matter of saying 'yea' or 'nay.' There are different interpretations of the law to consider, differing concepts on the rightness and wrongness of the alleged 'disrespectful remark' to ponder over. Things get complicated once religion enters the equation

Is it sacrilege to say Buddha and Muhammad need Jesus? The poll is not always an accurate mirror of online opinion, not when many voters are too biased to think objectively about the case. And especially not when there's a disproportionately high number of netizens and their exact clones who dislike OYK's guts and could hardly contain their glee over the opportunity to sully his reputation and hopefully vote him out of the forum.

The main point of contention is whether OYK is really as ugly as sin, putting their constant bickering aside and factoring out their personal feelings in making a judgment. The result of the opinion poll came as no surprise to me, and I believe also to clear-headed and unbiased persons with no axe to grind.

I don't believe those who voted for me to be booted out of the forum are staunch in their belief in either Islam or Buddhism. I would say they are staunch in supporting thr oppo and in destroying PAP and its supporters.

And you guessed correctly. A lot of them are "crones" who voted multiper taims. They are as evil as sin.