[sgh]

Every ceasefire only end up with yet another war with greater deaths than the before. Base on this trend, the next war will result in more deaths and then the next one after that. Any attempts for further ceasefire is nothing but pushing the problems to future generations where greater amount of deaths will occur. Israel went along with the thoughts of Deng Xiaoping who once said, if he have to kill hundred of students for China's decades of peace then so be it. Therefore, if eradicating HAMA and in the process cost tens of thousands of deaths but prevent future generations of hundred of thousands of deaths then so be it.

Is it wrong to kill innocents, certainly. Is it right to save future innocents, certainly. So who draw the line?

I know this of cuz that is why I say if Israel is not able to annihilate and wipe them all out then just be prepared for the revenge attacks on their own offspring in future. Hitler try to wipe out all Jews but failed so what make Israel think they can do the same to Palestine? Some ppl differentiate saying should target only Hamas. Come on let's be realistic the Palestine civilian now dying some children will grow up and re-form or join Hamas again in future and then we have another repeated scenario on hand and this time the grown up Palestine will whack the Israel children back. Pay them back for what their fathers do to them when they are children. The cycle repeats.