[Lu5ck]

I know this of cuz that is why I say if Israel is not able to annihilate and wipe them all out then just be prepared for the revenge attacks on their own offspring in future. Hitler try to wipe out all Jews but failed so what make Israel think they can do the same to Palestine? Some ppl differentiate saying should target only Hamas. Come on let's be realistic the Palestine civilian now dying some children will grow up and re-form or join Hamas again in future and then we have another repeated scenario on hand and this time the grown up Palestine will whack the Israel children back. Pay them back for what their fathers do to them when they are children. The cycle repeats.

Annihilate Palestine? Is it hard? Of course it isn't. Israel can just air bomb everything to the ground. If annihilation of Palestine is what they trying to do, there is absolutely no need to warn them before bombing. There is no need to tell them to evacuate. Truth is they isn't doing that, you are simply accusing them for doing it. I think is very dishonest to frame collateral damage as intention for annihilation.

You can use a "what if" another HAMA is formed. The thing is we don't know if another HAMA will form but we do know that there is HAMA now and this HAMA is gonna continue the trend of cycling between war and ceasefire.

Like I have said earlier, is it wrong to kill innocents, certainly. Is it right to save future innocents, certainly. So who draw the line?