[Blasterlord2]

You have a simple, economical writing style whereas I'm known for my loquaciousness. Writing a laconic reply or pithy one-liners is just not my style. I like to put flesh on the bare bones of any issues to make it clear and more interesting, and writing such a wordy post requires attention to detail.

Really, I don't criticize your spare style of writing but you have often faulted my writing as too long or not getting to the point and beating about the bush. This happened when I punched holes in your arguments. No worries, I'm immune to criticism just as most posters here are. In this place you need to be able to take criticism. Opening criticizing others seems to be a common practice among many keyboard warriors. I believe men have an atavistic desire to dominate others.

I dun have a desire to dominate over u. But I'm very interested to know how a Christian looks at the actions of other Christians and whether they agree that they should be done that way.

In almost every post that I made, oyk has distorted my words then turned around and call me a jhk, a rk supporter etc, without giving any reference of those quotes I made. Then he brought my mother into the picture even though I told him not to do it. You could of cos say, "you only asked me about his statement on Buddha and Mohammad needing Jesus, not his other behaviour". But I could tell you, if it's only about one isolated incident of shenanigans, no one will hate him so much. It's a package, and it is his consistent intentional misrepresentation of other people's words that and other bad behaviour that caused many to have resentment towards him.

I ask you, is this how a good Christian should behave. I want to know if it's a matter of a Christian "looking the other side" because it is the action another Christian.