[Blasterlord2]

If "punching holes (or tearing a hole) in your argument" isn't the happiest choice of words, then "finding a crack in your armour" should be an apt description of how you evaded the issue. At issue was your proclamation that "Oyk has definitely not lived up to his own preach."

That is a definitive statement of yours and not what you claimed to be a solicitation for my opinion. You should have addressed this issue by simply admitting you made this statement instead of dodging it by making other irrelevant remarks such as "I didn't read your post in detail 'cos  it's too long-winded.. and you are not getting to the point ... not responding to my question .. blah, blah.” Strangely, you kept posing this question to me, which was actually your statement.

You just dun get it. You may have a flair for words but definitely not there in logical reasoning. It's not about the choice of words. The substance behind the words is not even there. Whichever you craft it, it definitely has not poked any holes into my arguments. Perhaps you dun even understand what I'm writing at all. 

Like your good friend, you have merely made declarations about things that you have falsely interpreted. But then the two of you are birds of the same feather. What can I say? Or maybe it's a matter of Christian taking care of another Christian.

Till now, you've not responded directly to my asking your opinion about what your good friend has said in this forum. You dun have an opinion or you're too cowardly to say it?