[S I M T A N]

You just dun get it. You may have a flair for words but definitely not there in logical reasoning. It's not about the choice of words. The substance behind the words is not even there. Whichever you craft it, it definitely has not poked any holes into my arguments. Perhaps you dun even understand what I'm writing at all. 

Like your good friend, you have merely made declarations about things that you have falsely interpreted. But then the two of you are birds of the same feather. What can I say? Or maybe it's a matter of Christian taking care of another Christian.

Till now, you've not responded directly to my asking your opinion about what your good friend has said in this forum. You dun have an opinion or you're too cowardly to say it?

No one is perfect. Ace writers do make mistakes at times when they do not choose their words carefully or check what they have written. When I realised it (my punching holes statement) wasn't the happiest choice of words, I was game enough to change it to finding just a crack in your armour although I'd discerned a few more chinks that I could use to attack you.

Your asking me this rhetorical question of what I think of Oyk has long been a sticking point in our discussion. Usually, people ask a rhetorical question as a way of making a statement without expecting an answer because the answer is pretty obvious. Putting certain rhetorical questions to people put them in an awkward position.

You were certain Oyk had made what you felt was a very inapt comment about other's religion. It beats me why you kept asking for my view on something that you had already publicly announced. I relented and proffered my opinion after being asked relentlessly by you. Even today you're still harping on about my views, or the lack thereof, and dismissing whatever opinions I'd proffered as beating around the bush. Sometimes I can't help but wonder if you really know what a rhetorical question is. Or are you dying to hear me say Oyk is as miserable as sin?