[Blasterlord2]

No one is perfect. Ace writers do make mistakes at times when they do not choose their words carefully or check what they have written. When I realised it (my punching holes statement) wasn't the happiest choice of words, I was game enough to change it to finding just a crack in your armour although I'd discerned a few more chinks that I could use to attack you.

Your asking me this rhetorical question of what I think of Oyk has long been a sticking point in our discussion. Usually, people ask a rhetorical question as a way of making a statement without expecting an answer because the answer is pretty obvious. Putting certain rhetorical questions to people put them in an awkward position.

You were certain Oyk had made what you felt was a very inapt comment about other's religion. It beats me why you kept asking for my view on something that you had already publicly announced. I relented and proffered my opinion after being asked relentlessly by you. Even today you're still harping on about my views, or the lack thereof, and dismissing whatever opinions I'd proffered as beating around the bush. Sometimes I can't help but wonder if you really know what a rhetorical question is. Or are you dying to hear me say Oyk is as miserable as sin?

You're going in circles again. Telling grandmother stories all over again. 

So the conclusion is you think oyk is perfectly all right, that he put words into people's mouths is all right, that he distorts the meaning of people is right, that he made reference to people's mothers is all right, that he said Buddha and Mohammed need Jesus is all right etc etc etc. You're a scum just like him.