[Blasterlord2]

Nope, I don't deal in assumptions, certainly not one-sided assumptions. I spoke truthfully. Then you butted in and accused me of making the outrageous claim that "he has outwitted all of us." You said it - the words in inverted commas. I didn't. If that's not putting words in my mouth, I don't know what is.

I merely said Oyk CAN outwit his nemeses in a battle of wits. I didn't even use the modal verb "will" to proclaim that he will outwit his nemeses. "Will" denotes something that is certain to happen. I used "can" to express the possibility of that happening, but it is not certain. That means he has got the wits to outsmart, frustrate and wear his interlocutors out, just like what he did to you in that battle of wills. You're his first scalp.

Equally, his defeat cannot be ruled out since no one is unbeatable. He can be outmaneuvered by trickier and thicker-skinned opponents even though he is quick-witted and pretty quick on the uptake. That remains to be seen. Fair enough?

Believe me, I always try my damnedest to provide an unblinking view of things. You said the damnedest thing today. I don't mind you dragging my grandmother into our petty squabbles but please for heaven's sake don't ask me awkward questions anymore because it is getting increasingly frustrating and time-consuming trying to answer those questions that will get us nowhere.

You said you dun assume and you speak truthfully. That's even worse for you. Because it's no longer just a case of a Christian supporting another Christian (whatever his action and words), you really believe that he's able to outwit us. It shows how dimwit you are. Does outwitting people mean twisting ppl's words? You said I say the damnedest thing. It's just too bad. Your believing that he's that quick-witted shows exactly that. I'm just calling a spade a spade. 

You dun mind me dragging your grandmother into the squabble but no, I'm not your beloved oyk, I dun do it. Are you thinking of him so much that you think I behave like him?