[[[ForeverAlone]]]

All your things are wrong.
If the mandate drops to 49%, PAP cannot do those things.

Every 5 years, 60% support PAP to do those things.
PAP has 60% mandate to do those things.

If 70% did not support Tharman, Tharman cannot become President by himself.
similarly, if 60% did not support PAP, PAP cannot do those things by themselves.

if the 60% support is always there, why should PAP do things differently or do more things to improve.

if you always have 60% market share, will you reduce price ?
no, you will increase price to boost profit.

Actually I ask those always vote PAP ones , they actually don't want to vote PAP but " No Choice " in the sense Opposition always cannot get people etc...

WP can win Sengkang because they managed to get good candidates on par with PAP but the rest cannot win due to mixture of good candidates and so so ones.

the rest no need say , always just only have two good candidates the rest so so .