Retrenched Lazada employees are questioning non-compete clauses

theold

Supreme Guru
Reputation: 128

Posts: 36,033 Threads: 26,169
Likes Received: 2,598 in 2,426 posts
Likes Given: 26

12-01-2024, 09:13 PM

If they were retrenched, this non-compete clause should not apply. MOM should be able to solve these easily. The clawback clause is a problem. For the first time, I came across the clawback clause for a bank loan after the lock-in period of 2 years. This ends up you are supposed to remain with the same bank for a renewed loan with a higher interest rate.

(This post was last modified: 12-01-2024, 09:19 PM by theold.)

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Retrenched Lazada employees are questioning non-compete clauses - by Bigiron - 12-01-2024, 02:30 PM

RE: Retrenched Lazada employees are questioning non-compete clauses - by ODA TETSURO - 12-01-2024, 02:34 PM

RE: Retrenched Lazada employees are questioning non-compete clauses - by singaporean1964 - 12-01-2024, 02:51 PM

RE: Retrenched Lazada employees are questioning non-compete clauses - by Levin - 12-01-2024, 03:30 PM

RE: Retrenched Lazada employees are questioning non-compete clauses - by sgbuffett - 12-01-2024, 03:57 PM

RE: Retrenched Lazada employees are questioning non-compete clauses - by Bigiron - 12-01-2024, 09:28 PM

RE: Retrenched Lazada employees are questioning non-compete clauses - by sclim - 12-01-2024, 08:57 PM

RE: Retrenched Lazada employees are questioning non-compete clauses - by Ola - 12-01-2024, 09:13 PM