28-04-2024, 01:56 PM
(28-04-2024, 01:38 PM)pinkpanther Wrote: You always bring out the inaccuracies in the bible,..say mark, John, Matthew, luke...they are perverted gospels...claimed by your so called Muslim scholars!....so where are the unperverted ones then??? Am I suppose to believe a revelation that came 500 yrs after Jesus?and that book the quran is a better representation of the historic Jesus ....
is it way better than the Gospels written by eyes witnesses? Well I am sorry...if I want to study a historical person..I don go running to a guy who lived 500yrs after the fact! I go after the eye witnesses!
I don't like that word, perverted. It has a negative connotation. If you must define the Gospels, you can use 'corrupted' instead. Bruce Metzger, a giant among the NT scholars who was a Christian, used the word 'corruption' to define the Gospels.
![[Image: 51htYcWyNdL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51htYcWyNdL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg)