[pinkpanther]

People were confused about Jesus. There were rumors going around. The disciples spoke about the rumors and then Jesus asked them, "Who do YOU say that I am?" and Peter answered, "You are the Messiah". 

I will now use that as a counter-argument to your claim that Jesus is God in the flesh. When Peter said Jesus is the Messiah, that means Peter is not saying Jesus is God in the flesh because, in Peter's paradigm, the Messiah is not God or God in the flesh.

Don be confuse my friend! I sayang you OK!

Let's all agree that he led a life free from sins! Humans sin...who doesn't sin? God does not! This we can agree tiok boh!

Because he doesn't sin ...his divine nature made him fit for the work of Redeemer...His human body allowed him to shed the blood necessary to redeem. No human being with a sin nature could pay such a debt...this we can agree tiok boh... No one else could meet the requirements to become the sacrifice for the sins of the whole world

If Jesus was merely a good man as you may claim, then he must had a sin nature and thus deem not perfect. ....can I see you agree with me again!...OK good! In that case, his death and resurrection would have no power to save anyone...correct?

Because Jesus was God in the flesh, he alone could pay the debt we owed to God..... His victory over death and the grave won the victory for everyone who puts their trust in Him....cmon Ali...repeat after me..In Jesus name we pray...Amen!