[Oyk]

First, can we rule out satan using that criteria I've mentioned yesterday?

1. I asked you to show me the Qur'anic verse which says that the angel was Jibril.  You replied that there was no verse that said so. 

2.  The foundations of Christianity and Islam rest on the teachings of Paul and Muh respectively. If Muh is right..and I had been trying so hard to get clarifications from you but only got twists and turns....then Paul is the false prophet and let's not mince words here, a false prophet preaches Satanic doctrines. 

So I shant rule out Satan whether it's the Quran or Acts or the Epistles. I am prepared to be open minded and not be defensive and if Paul is indeed the agent of Lucifer disguised as an angel of light, I will admit it. 

As for you, you refuse to have a gentleman's dialogue. You only want to start by assuming that it can't be Satan without any proof from the Qur'an, and went to borrow from another religion's Bible which you did so many times in all your arguments whenever the Quran had no answer. You tiptoed around the Bible cherry picking verses which suited your narrative. 

To be honest, Hope had the better approach in "evangelizing". He put in efforts to show us the Qur'anic verses. You didn't. Instead of quoting the Quran, you quoted another religion's Bible to either support your arguments if it suited you, or to mock which you denied.

And you know it, Satan is working through either Paul or Muh to deceive the world. I will not rule out Satan in Paul's teachings which you have insinuated but shant say that the angel who pinned Muh to the ground with a supernatural force, thrice, till he went home in FEAR was Jibril unless you can show me proof.