[pinkpanther]

The Quran did not mention a helluva lot of things. On its own it's incomplete. While historical records in the Bible are complete, those in the Quran have no head and tail. They are just like random recital of biblical verses and often edited or paraphrased.

Then through the centuries, you all tried to fill the dotted lines with different peepur, all scholars and historians, saying different things. All contradicted one and another. So those which fit your Quran and give Glory to Muh, you'd say are reliable Hadith. Those which didn't, you just dismiss as unreliable.

And you will post over and over that picture of an AMDK saying the West lies about Muh when those inconvenient Hadith came from Moslems themselves, and not the West, not Christians and not erm Hindus.

Nah Ah Lee...Oyk changed the topic for you liao....you can bite on this bait!