A PILOT error may have been at least partly to blame for Tuesday's fatal SIA
#1

A PILOT error may have been at least partly to blame for Tuesday's fatal Singapore Airlines turbulence that left a Brit granddad dead.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/28070046/p...-hospital/

8Umbrella Umbrella
[+] 3 users Like klat's post
Reply
#2

A similar incident in the same week.

Sydney, Australia to Auckland, New Zealand

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/8E6TmcCPHDQ
Reply
#3

Quote:Another pilot claimed they were forced to divert around the same area just two days earlier.

Thunderstorms in the Bay of Bengal are reasonably common as the pilot said: "We were about 30 miles off track flying around the thunderstorms two days ago on the way to Singapore."

They take the same route hundreds times per year for decades, one fine day dis happens. Captain half zzz or iz really SIA bad luck. Oredy say amdk pilots more experienced and quick thinking.
[+] 2 users Like luncheonmeat's post
Reply
#4

will wait for the investigation report,
 SIA staff bonus may be affected by the findings.  Thinking
Reply
#5

(23-05-2024, 09:19 PM)klat Wrote:  A PILOT error may have been at least partly to blame for Tuesday's fatal Singapore Airlines turbulence that left a Brit granddad dead.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/28070046/p...-hospital/
How the pilot handled the chaotic situation is now a big question.
Reply
#6

(24-05-2024, 10:08 AM)Gemstar Wrote:  How the pilot handled the chaotic situation is now a big question.

He is a hero to prevent the plane crash.
Reply
#7

(24-05-2024, 10:37 AM)K88 shu shu Wrote:  He is a hero to prevent the plane crash.

Provided that he is AMDK, sure take credit. But now like haven't, so must be CECA.

疫苗可以不打, 手枪一定要打!
疫苗可以不注射, 精子一定要远射!
Reply
#8

(23-05-2024, 11:09 PM)watchfirst9 Wrote:  will wait for the investigation report,
 SIA staff bonus may be affected by the findings.  Thinking

maybe in trenches, pay half that is 4 mths the rest later at end of yr
Reply
#9

So far took 4 times internal flight in India. The ceca pilots were quite skillful. When he saw thick cloud ahead he would announce in the PA system that he would bring the plane higher. Don't know if they can see turbulence ahead or not.

Surprised that the last trip few months ago, those ah neh really behaved very well in the plane, a great change compared to last time
Reply
#10

obvious what...............straight away - they talk about turbulence but never check flight recorder yet............

so i knew.................either CECA pilot...............or the plane is a Boeing............
Reply
#11

(24-05-2024, 11:49 AM)ODA TETSURO Wrote:  Provided that he is AMDK, sure take credit. But now like haven't, so must be CECA.
If CECA, SIA charm liao. Sure kena claim until pants drop. Then reputation also tarnish.     Rolleyes

 Thinking is difficult, that's why most people judge
                    Carl Jung
[+] 1 user Likes Huliwang's post
Reply
#12

(24-05-2024, 01:24 PM)Huliwang Wrote:  If CECA, SIA charm liao. Sure kena claim until pants drop. Then reputation also tarnish.     Rolleyes



Is it really the pilot's error.


That is the BIG question

8Umbrella Umbrella
Reply
#13

(24-05-2024, 06:38 PM)klat Wrote:  Is it really the pilot's error.


That is the BIG question

Looks like he might get F...k for not warning passengers of wearing safety belt or altering course to avoid heading into the patch when approaching turbulence patches. These patches should be picked up by  radar unless the radar is defective. Even my ship's radar can picked up rain cloud patches so can't think of any reason for not detected.      Rolleyes

 Thinking is difficult, that's why most people judge
                    Carl Jung
[+] 1 user Likes Huliwang's post
Reply
#14

(24-05-2024, 06:38 PM)klat Wrote:  Is it really the pilot's error.


That is the BIG question
only after thorough investigationfrom the many parties will know
Reply
#15

(24-05-2024, 11:52 AM)talky Wrote:  maybe in trenches, pay half that is 4 mths the rest later at end of yr

Anyway all possibilities still open, act of goat, human and plane.

Until preliminary report is out, some people confidence of travelling by plane may be dented.
Particularly those hurt may not live the same as in the past, so is important to know the reason.
Reply
#16

Here's what the British have to say about the Sun.

"Why is everyone saying not to buy the UK paper The Sun?

In the large, rational sense, it's because the Sun is a tabloid that peddles mindless lies in order to make quick money."
[+] 2 users Like Alice Alicia's post
Reply
#17

(24-05-2024, 07:52 PM)talky Wrote:  only after thorough investigationfrom the many parties will know


In Sinkapoor, the truth can become untruth depending on the kangaroo courk

Laughing
Reply
#18

Tks all the bbfa armchair aviation sexperts for your input.

了不起.
Reply
#19

(24-05-2024, 06:38 PM)klat Wrote:  Is it really the pilot's error.


That is the BIG question

It looks that way
Reply
#20

(25-05-2024, 08:49 AM)Gstalk Wrote:  In Sinkapoor, the truth can become untruth depending on the kangaroo courk

Captain didn't see plane heading into turbulence
He didn't warn passengers and turned seatbelt sign on.
Plunging 6,000 feet is unbelievable
Reply
#21

(25-05-2024, 09:35 AM)Scythian Wrote:  Captain didn't see plane heading into turbulence
He didn't warn passengers and turned seatbelt sign on.
Plunging 6,000 feet is unbelievable



So the turbulence is clear and not black, so cannot see? Or pilots sleepy and tired?

Laughing
Reply
#22

(25-05-2024, 11:59 AM)Gstalk Wrote:  So the turbulence is clear and not black, so cannot see? Or pilots sleepy and tired?

Read somewhere that the flight path is taken by many planes, so to determine whether the SQ pilots made proper judgement, investigators just need to compare the flight routes taken by other planes flying in front of and behind SQ321 to see if they had made a detour at the turbulence area.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)