Posts: 5,733
   
Threads: 865
    
Likes Received: 1,901 in 1,459 posts
Likes Given: 202
Instead of trade war, Trump should seek trade talk with China to expand buying of US goods to reverse trade deficits.
With trade war, trade deficits widens instead of narrowing.
Now China opens up market for RCEP for 14 other countries in ASEAN, Japan, Korea, Aussie, NZ, etc. China also may join CPTPP benefiting other countries again.
China also signed deals to buy oil from Russia, 25-year deal with Iran, etc. Now 6 OPEC countries also visit Beijing. What do they do? Of course, oil deal with China.
If Trump first started to seek deal of buying US shale oil, trade benefits could have gone to US instead of going to others.
Don't you think Trump is stupid to start trade war?
.
(This post was last modified: 14-01-2022, 06:22 PM by
webinarian.)
Posts: 6,390
   
Threads: 95
    
Likes Received: 1,838 in 1,452 posts
Likes Given: 412
(14-01-2022, 06:19 PM)webinarian Wrote: Instead of trade war, Trump should seek trade talk with China to expand buying of US goods to reverse trade deficits.
With trade war, trade deficits widens instead of narrowing.
Now China opens up market for RCEP for 14 other countries in ASEAN, Japan, Korea, Aussie, NZ, etc. China also may join CPTPP benefiting other countries again.
China also signed deals to buy oil from Russia, 25-year deal with Iran, etc. Now 6 OPEC countries also visit Beijing. What do they do? Of course, oil deal with China.
If Trump first started to seek deal of buying US shale oil, trade benefits could have gone to US instead of going to others.
Don't you think Trump is stupid to start trade war?
.
Start trade war to blame someone for the failure.
Posts: 11,571
   
Threads: 784
    
Likes Received: 3,627 in 2,968 posts
Likes Given: 486
IMO, he is not wrong. The American leaders are already cognizant that they're losing their competitive edge to China so even if it's not Trump, somebody will do it. Maybe they'll do it quietly instead of so loudly, but someone will do it. Even Biden is tackling China in another way.
The only real problem they have is that they started the trade war too late. They should have done it 10 years ago.
Posts: 20,170
   
Threads: 546
    
Likes Received: 4,667 in 4,160 posts
Likes Given: 481
(14-01-2022, 06:19 PM)webinarian Wrote: Instead of trade war, Trump should seek trade talk with China to expand buying of US goods to reverse trade deficits.
With trade war, trade deficits widens instead of narrowing.
Now China opens up market for RCEP for 14 other countries in ASEAN, Japan, Korea, Aussie, NZ, etc. China also may join CPTPP benefiting other countries again.
China also signed deals to buy oil from Russia, 25-year deal with Iran, etc. Now 6 OPEC countries also visit Beijing. What do they do? Of course, oil deal with China.
If Trump first started to seek deal of buying US shale oil, trade benefits could have gone to US instead of going to others.
Don't you think Trump is stupid to start trade war?
.
The bottomline is Trump is stupid to start trade war with China, cos China can trade with so many countries world wide.......
Posts: 5,733
   
Threads: 865
    
Likes Received: 1,901 in 1,459 posts
Likes Given: 202
(14-01-2022, 06:34 PM)Blasterlord2 Wrote: IMO, he is not wrong. The American leaders are already cognizant that they're losing their competitive edge to China so even if it's not Trump, somebody will do it. Maybe they'll do it quietly instead of so loudly, but someone will do it. Even Biden is tackling China in another way.
The only real problem they have is that they started the trade war too late. They should have done it 10 years ago.
The outcome is the trade deficits widened instead of narrowed, right?
He didn't achieve his aim of getting China to buy more from US, right?
China is willing to buy shale oil from US. Trade war actually drove away China to buy gas from Russia, 25-year contract to buy from Iran enriching Iran to have the will and strength not to kowtow to US and also RCEP to make Asia big again.
.
Posts: 841
   
Threads: 185
    
Likes Received: 114 in 98 posts
Likes Given: 156
Angmohs have been robbing and stealing from weak nations for hundreds of years. They don't know what is win-win. They only know win-lose.
Posts: 11,571
   
Threads: 784
    
Likes Received: 3,627 in 2,968 posts
Likes Given: 486
(14-01-2022, 07:07 PM)webinarian Wrote: The outcome is the trade deficits widened instead of narrowed, right?
He didn't achieve his aim of getting China to buy more from US, right?
China is willing to buy shale oil from US. Trade war actually drove away China to buy gas from Russia, 25-year contract to buy from Iran enriching Iran to have the will and strength not to kowtow to US and also RCEP to make Asia big again.
.
That's why I said they started this 10 years late. If they started this earlier then China would have to agree to every of their terms. Now the chances of success for the Americans are much diminished.
(This post was last modified: 14-01-2022, 07:15 PM by
Blasterlord2.)
Posts: 841
   
Threads: 185
    
Likes Received: 114 in 98 posts
Likes Given: 156
China has already given up on trying to be nice to USA.
Posts: 4,154
   
Threads: 897
    
Likes Received: 258 in 250 posts
Likes Given: 758
(14-01-2022, 07:15 PM)alanis Wrote: China has already given up on trying to be nice to USA.
yah, can see .
Posts: 20,170
   
Threads: 546
    
Likes Received: 4,667 in 4,160 posts
Likes Given: 481
(14-01-2022, 07:15 PM)alanis Wrote: China has already given up on trying to be nice to USA.
The US has allocated $300 million to belittle China..
Posts: 10,757
   
Threads: 36
    
Likes Received: 1,403 in 1,255 posts
Likes Given: 2,610
(14-01-2022, 07:10 PM)alanis Wrote: Angmohs have been robbing and stealing from weak nations for hundreds of years. They don't know what is win-win. They only know win-lose.
What have Singapore lost?
Posts: 10,757
   
Threads: 36
    
Likes Received: 1,403 in 1,255 posts
Likes Given: 2,610
(14-01-2022, 07:15 PM)alanis Wrote: China has already given up on trying to be nice to USA.
Since when was China nice to the US?