[Ali Imran]

The answer is simple enough, look at who is always asking the question and ask yourself does this group have a motive for asking it? The two main groups asking are atheists who don't want it to be true, so realizing the historical facts of the bible have been attacked and the bible came back clear of corruption, so changed their tactics. 

And the other major group claiming corruption is Islam. They are taught as often as possible that the bible was corrupted.


### Scholars Supporting the Reliability of the Bible

1. **William F. Albright (1891–1971)**
   - An influential biblical archaeologist who argued that many of the biblical narratives, especially the early history of Israel, are supported by archaeological evidence.

2. **Kenneth Kitchen**
   - An Egyptologist and biblical scholar who defends the historical reliability of the Old Testament, especially in relation to Egyptian and Near Eastern history.

3. **F.F. Bruce (1910–1990)**
   - A renowned biblical scholar who emphasized the historical reliability of the New Testament and the textual integrity of biblical manuscripts.

4. **N.T. Wright**
   - A contemporary New Testament scholar who affirms the historical credibility of biblical accounts, especially concerning the resurrection of Jesus.

5. **Gordon Wenham**
   - An Old Testament scholar who has written extensively on the historical reliability of biblical texts.

Did any of them say the Bible is NOT corrupted?

The answer is no.