[Lukongsimi]

Which scholars say the Bible is uncorrupted?

Many scholars, including both Christian and some Muslim scholars, have argued that the Bible has not been corrupted. While acknowledging minor textual variations in manuscripts, they assert that the core message and meaning of the Bible have been remarkably preserved. 

Here's a more detailed look:
Christian Scholars:

• Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort:
  These renowned textual critics, who produced The New Testament in the Original Greek, emphasized that the vast majority of the New Testament text has no variation or doubt, with substantial variations comprising only a small fraction of the whole. 
  
  
• Bruce Metzger:
  A prominent New Testament scholar, Metzger pointed out that Origen's claims about manuscript corruption were based on theological and exegetical grounds rather than textual ones. 
  
  
• Many others:
  A large number of Christian scholars and theologians believe the Bible has been remarkably well preserved despite minor differences over the centuries. 
  
  

Muslim Scholars:

• Ali al-Tabari, Amr al-Ghakhiz, Bukhari, Al-Mas'udi, Abu Ali Husain Bin Sina, Al-Ghazali, Ibn-Khaldun, and others:
  Several Muslim scholars, including those listed here, have accepted the authenticity of the Gospels and other Bible texts. 
  
  
• Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan:
  The founder of Aligarh College stated that it's not proven that corruption of the Bible (tahrif-i-lafzi) occurred. 
  
  
• Fakhruddin Razi:
  Razi, on the authority of Ibn Abbas, argued that it was not practicable to corrupt the Bible because the scriptures were widely known and circulated. 
  
  
• Ibn Taymiyyah:
  Ibn Taymiyyah stated that the four Gospels were written after Jesus was taken up into heaven and they transmit some of his words, actions, and miracles.