Posts: 12,834
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 3,455 in 3,103 posts
Likes Given: 2,787
(28-04-2025, 02:39 AM)S I M T A N Wrote: When it comes to the crux of the gospel message, Ali Imran isn't clueless. He has elementary notions of the gospel but has difficulty imagining one God in three persons. The triune God and other spiritual things are a closed book to him. That comes of spiritual blindness. The Greek word for "blindness" denotes a hardness of heart. It's with the heart that we perceive spiritually.
As a bred-in-the-bone Muslim, he rejects the core beliefs of the Christian faith outright - such as the trinity, the deity of Christ and His resurrection. No one in history could have wanted to disprove the resurrection more than the temple authorities or the Roman hierarchy. In subsequent years, no force would have wanted to rob Christianity of that claim more than Islam did.
The gospel is a call for everyone of us to die - to die to sin and to die to self - and to gladly deny ourselves in order to experience entirely new life in Christ. This is the essence of what it means to be a Christain. Will Ali bring himself to do it? Not on his life. To accept the church's teachings is to depart from his own faith.
His lifelong obsession with theological debates with Christians is very much in evidence. And his usual plan of attack is to amplify seemingly contradictory verses in the Bible and then put his own interpretation on those passages. A verse alone taken out of context violates other scripture. All the Christian jousters in other forums eventually disengaged themselves one by one from debates with him after being totally worn out by his dogged persistence, leaving him the last man standing and having the final say in the argument but not the objective truth. It seems that he's met his match right here. 
He builds his own castle refuse to accept Christ as the Saviour who died for our sin
Thinking hell is temporary and eventually all will go to heaven.
To him there is no eternal punishment
Their teachings is different more to killings hatred
See any Jew hiding behind any tree just kill them
Woman to be slapped if disobedience to their man
In Bible man has to love their wife and not to divorce and marry again
it’s adultery!
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you also be like him" (Proverbs 26:4)
>
(This post was last modified: 28-04-2025, 12:01 PM by
Lukongsimi.)
Posts: 3,887
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 210 in 203 posts
Likes Given: 61
(28-04-2025, 02:39 AM)S I M T A N Wrote: When it comes to the crux of the gospel message, Ali Imran isn't clueless. He has elementary notions of the gospel but has difficulty imagining one God in three persons. The triune God and other spiritual things are a closed book to him. That comes of spiritual blindness. The Greek word for "blindness" denotes a hardness of heart. It's with the heart that we perceive spiritually.
You cannot accuse me of spiritual blindness for rejecting the Trinity because I have explained clearly why I reject it.
1. No prophets of God ever taught us that God is a Trinity.
2. The scriptures don't explicitly support the doctrine of the Trinity. You can only show me ambiguous verses.
3. The scriptures reject the idea of the Trinity. I have shown explicit, unambiguous verses.
4. It is illogical. Jesus said we are to use our hearts and minds, not just the heart. The mind cannot accept it if it is illogical, and the Trinity is illogical.
5. Last but not least, I know how Jesus's status was eventually elevated. We can say based on the scriptures, that at the time of Pentecost, Jesus was still just a man. Peter said so.
Posts: 3,887
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 210 in 203 posts
Likes Given: 61
(28-04-2025, 02:55 AM)S I M T A N Wrote: You want justice on your terms? Well, it can only be on God's terms, not yours. For your info, there's a fundamental difference between personal atonement (paying for your own sins) and vicarious atonement (having the penalty paid by another). The former is the law of karma (which is incompatible with mercy), and the latter, the rule of grace (the highest form of mercy shown in Christendom).
Because Christ was sinless, his death was not necessary to pay for His own sin. Nevertheless, His life was voluntarily given to pay the penalty for the sins of others (John 10:17-18). "He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him (2 Cor 5:21). Christ's substitutionary atonement paid all of our "karmic debt" through his own suffering. He had no Karma of His own, but He suffered and died for our sins.
What Ezekiel chapter 18 says is ignored by you because there is no stipulation for payment of any kind. God can just erase our sins. That is what forgiveness is all about.
Justice is justice. If an innocent man is punished for the wrongdoings of others, that is unjust, period.
Posts: 3,887
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 210 in 203 posts
Likes Given: 61
(28-04-2025, 02:39 AM)S I M T A N Wrote: No one in history could have wanted to disprove the resurrection more than the temple authorities or the Roman hierarchy.
The Romans were in power, not the temple authorities. As for the Romans, they loved this resurrection thingy. The ancient Roman mythology has at least one Jesus-like personality in terms of resurrection.
So you're wrong to say the Romans would want to disprove the resurrection.
Posts: 3,887
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 210 in 203 posts
Likes Given: 61
(28-04-2025, 02:43 AM)S I M T A N Wrote: Moses is arguably the greatest of the OT prophets, but Jesus was more than a prophet. "Moses was faithful in all his house as a servant... but Christ was faithful as a Son over His house" (Heb 3:5-6). While Moses served God, Jesus was declared to be the Son of God with the right to rule over all servants. Simply speaking, Moses never claimed to be God, but Jesus did (John 8:58; 10:30). Moses gave the law of God (John 1:17), but Jesus was the only One who ever fulfilled the law (Rom 8:2-4). Moses gave the law that condemns us (Rom 8:3), but Jesus provided the grace that redeems us (John 1:17; Gal 3:13)
No, I don't see anywhere in the NT where Jesus claimed to be God. When he was accused of making that claim, he refuted the accusation.
Posts: 3,887
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 210 in 203 posts
Likes Given: 61
(26-04-2025, 01:32 PM)Lukongsimi Wrote: He has no clue what salvation is about
Comparison of Paul and Jesus is not about salvation
Salvation is that you believe Jesus is the only way the truth and the life
Surely we must compare the teachings on salvation between Paul and Jesus. They are not the same.
If you follow Paul, that means you must disregard what Jesus said about salvation.
We can discuss this important issue with civility. We must get it right.
Posts: 12,834
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 3,455 in 3,103 posts
Likes Given: 2,787
U r a moslem n u follow muh
What is Jesus n Paul to u?
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you also be like him" (Proverbs 26:4)
>
Posts: 12,834
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 3,455 in 3,103 posts
Likes Given: 2,787
Paul said
“But I make known to you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached by me is not according to man. For I neither received it from man, nor was I taught it, but it came through the revelation of Jesus Christ.”
Galatians 1:11-12 NKJV
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you also be like him" (Proverbs 26:4)
>
Posts: 3,887
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 210 in 203 posts
Likes Given: 61
(28-04-2025, 03:16 PM)Lukongsimi Wrote: U r a moslem n u follow muh
What is Jesus n Paul to u?
Jesus is the Messiah, a prophet of God. Peace be upon him.
Paul was a suspicious personality. His teachings were rejected by the disciples, like James and Peter.
Posts: 12,834
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 3,455 in 3,103 posts
Likes Given: 2,787
Your muh not suspicious personality ?
Paul didn’t messed with under aged girls or taught people to kill.
He was chosen by Jesus to preach to the gentiles.
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest you also be like him" (Proverbs 26:4)
>
(This post was last modified: 28-04-2025, 03:28 PM by
Lukongsimi.)
Posts: 3,887
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 210 in 203 posts
Likes Given: 61
(28-04-2025, 03:26 PM)Lukongsimi Wrote: Your muh not suspicious personality ?
No, not at all. Our Prophet صلي الله عليه وسلم, is probably the most transparent person in history.
Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)