[Lukongsimi]

However, many scholars, including those who study the Bible's textual history, argue that the core message and teachings of the Bible have been remarkably well preserved despite these challenges

[Lukongsimi]

Pachik said that he sometimes felt that Allah is watching him pray...he can feel Allah's presence...what do you say Lksm?

Hallucinating maybe
How he knows its his allah not jinn?

[pinkpanther]

Only the moslems said that 

Yes only moslems will say that.... 

[pinkpanther]

Hallucinating maybe
How he knows its his allah not jinn?

 you throw him back the same answer

[Lukongsimi]

 you throw him back the same answer

Yes he reap what he sows lol 😆

[pinkpanther]

Yes he reap what he sows lol 😆

Yes, how he knows it is not the devil?

[Lukongsimi]

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the religious verses. For other uses, see Satanic verses (disambiguation).
The Satanic Verses are words of "satanic suggestion" which the Islamic prophet Muhammad is alleged to have mistaken for divine revelation.[1] The first use of the expression in English is attributed to Sir William Muir in 1858.[2]

The words praise the three pagan Meccan goddesses: al-Lāt, al-'Uzzá, and Manāt and can be read in early prophetic biographies of Muhammad by al-Wāqidī, Ibn Sa'd and the tafsir of al-Tabarī. Religious authorities recorded the story for the first two centuries of the Islamic era. Strong objections to the historicity of the Satanic Verses incident were, however, raised as early as the tenth century.[3] By the 13th century, most Islamic scholars (Ulama) started to reject it on the basis of it being inconsistent with the theological principle of 'iṣmat al-anbiyā (impeccability of the prophets) and the methodological principle of isnad-criticism.[1] According to some Islamic traditions, God sent Satan as a tempter to test the audience. Others categorically deny that this incident ever happened.

The incident is accepted as true by some modern scholars of Islamic studies, citing the implausibility of early Muslim biographers fabricating a story so unflattering about their prophet.[4][5] Alford T. Welch, however, argues that this rationale alone is insufficient but does not rule out the possibility of some historical foundation to the story. He proposes that the story may be yet another instance of historical telescoping, i.e., a circumstance that Muhammad's contemporaries knew to have lasted for a long period of time later became condensed into a story that limits his acceptance of the Meccan goddesses’ intercession to a brief period of time and assigns blame for this departure from strict monotheism to Satan.[6] Carl W. Ernst writes that the existence of later insertions in early Meccan Surahs indicates that the Qurʾa was revised in dialogue with its first audience, who recited these Surahs frequently in worship services and asked questions about difficult passages. Application of this principle to Surah 53 (“The Star”) leads him to the conclusion that the so-called “Satanic Verses” in all likelihood never existed as part of the Qurʾan. He argues that the literary composition of the Chapter where the verses are alleged to have been recited, is heavily focused on rejection of polytheism which makes the inclusion of the Satanic Verses quote unrealistic. Its absence from the Canonical Hadith collections supports his claim.[7] Others have suggested that the story may have been fabricated for theological reasons.[8]

Wow 😮

[pinkpanther]

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the religious verses. For other uses, see Satanic verses (disambiguation).
The Satanic Verses are words of "satanic suggestion" which the Islamic prophet Muhammad is alleged to have mistaken for divine revelation.[1] The first use of the expression in English is attributed to Sir William Muir in 1858.[2]

The words praise the three pagan Meccan goddesses: al-Lāt, al-'Uzzá, and Manāt and can be read in early prophetic biographies of Muhammad by al-Wāqidī, Ibn Sa'd and the tafsir of al-Tabarī. Religious authorities recorded the story for the first two centuries of the Islamic era. Strong objections to the historicity of the Satanic Verses incident were, however, raised as early as the tenth century.[3] By the 13th century, most Islamic scholars (Ulama) started to reject it on the basis of it being inconsistent with the theological principle of 'iṣmat al-anbiyā (impeccability of the prophets) and the methodological principle of isnad-criticism.[1] According to some Islamic traditions, God sent Satan as a tempter to test the audience. Others categorically deny that this incident ever happened.

The incident is accepted as true by some modern scholars of Islamic studies, citing the implausibility of early Muslim biographers fabricating a story so unflattering about their prophet.[4][5] Alford T. Welch, however, argues that this rationale alone is insufficient but does not rule out the possibility of some historical foundation to the story. He proposes that the story may be yet another instance of historical telescoping, i.e., a circumstance that Muhammad's contemporaries knew to have lasted for a long period of time later became condensed into a story that limits his acceptance of the Meccan goddesses’ intercession to a brief period of time and assigns blame for this departure from strict monotheism to Satan.[6] Carl W. Ernst writes that the existence of later insertions in early Meccan Surahs indicates that the Qurʾa was revised in dialogue with its first audience, who recited these Surahs frequently in worship services and asked questions about difficult passages. Application of this principle to Surah 53 (“The Star”) leads him to the conclusion that the so-called “Satanic Verses” in all likelihood never existed as part of the Qurʾan. He argues that the literary composition of the Chapter where the verses are alleged to have been recited, is heavily focused on rejection of polytheism which makes the inclusion of the Satanic Verses quote unrealistic. Its absence from the Canonical Hadith collections supports his claim.[7] Others have suggested that the story may have been fabricated for theological reasons.[8]

Wow 😮

Satanic verses ! Who else?

[pinkpanther]

Yes, the Quran teaches Islam.

But Islam doesn't speak.

Genesis says that God appeared as a man and wrestled Jacob....God also appeared as a man and spoke to Abraham....Do you reject the book of Genesis which is a part of the Torah?

[Lukongsimi]

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1013863477500377?fs=e&fs=e
The power of the Bible.