Posts: 26,922
   
Threads: 7,866
    
Likes Received: 4,611 in 3,644 posts
Likes Given: 651
(14-09-2021, 06:42 PM)Huliwang Wrote: You are fear mongering. Why dun TOC give the identities of the sponsors if they have nothing to hide?....... 
Because it will violate their privacy and expose them to risk of govt monitoring and action.
If there is any real foreign interference the authority should show proof before they suspend
I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
>
(This post was last modified: 14-09-2021, 08:06 PM by
sgbuffett.)
Posts: 26,922
   
Threads: 7,866
    
Likes Received: 4,611 in 3,644 posts
Likes Given: 651
(14-09-2021, 07:55 PM)watchfirst9 Wrote: TOC should be more open who funded it, if is from foreign countries then stop it.
Crowd funding in Sg so easy.
If TOC survives through crowdfunding they will just find another way to shut it down.....
The old sgtalk survived on advertising not foreign funding...it was also shutdown.....
I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
>
(This post was last modified: 14-09-2021, 08:19 PM by
sgbuffett.)
Posts: 10,772
   
Threads: 10
    
Likes Received: 3,189 in 2,494 posts
Likes Given: 1,079
(14-09-2021, 08:06 PM)sgbuffett Wrote: Because it will violate their privacy and expose them to risk of govt monitoring and action.
If there is any real foreign interference the authority should show proof before they suspend
Hey, the suspension is due to TOC refusal to give identities of sponsors as required by IMDA and not because of foreign interference. You dun twist to mislead the readers.
Funny thing is why dun TOC submit unless there is really something cannot see light. If the sponsors are all law abiding people , why hide?.......
Thinking is difficult, that's why most people judge
Carl Jung
>
Posts: 19,772
   
Threads: 546
    
Likes Received: 4,579 in 4,080 posts
Likes Given: 474
(14-09-2021, 04:12 PM)Symmetry Wrote: I heard that Ho Ching salary is still unknown since 2017. Will she be sacked soon?
M/s Ho Ching's salary is top secret, cos she is the most powerful person here.
Posts: 4,048
   
Threads: 53
    
Likes Received: 1,061 in 827 posts
Likes Given: 1
(14-09-2021, 07:56 PM)Huliwang Wrote: It's different. Dun think HC has any obligation to disclose her salary if she does not wish to disclose. Of course this is irritating to me too as I wish to know how much she gets for her performance. In TOC case if the licensing authority IMDA requires the sponsors detail, TOC is obligated to submit. Failure to submit, IMDA can rightfully withdraws the licence as IMDA are responsible in case some illegal organisations sponsored it and this info is exposed through other sources for example whistle blowers. It is like CECA applicants are required to submit academic certs and failure of MOM to check properly had caused some embarrassment and criticisms...... 
Sorry, HC has obligation to disclose her salary. It might not be to us, but a MP should be able to ask for such info. After all, GIC is using Singaporean's money and MP is our proxy in parliament.
I am not saying TOC is right/wrong to withhold the sponsor's detail. Be it due to whatever reason, TOC has made a decision, and will have to pay whatever price it is for not disclosing.
1. I have served the nation in a combat unit for 2.5 + 10 years. I had fulfilled my duty as a citizen, but has the country do it's part for me?
2. I don't know where the threat of CCP is, but I know the threat of CECA is already at my doorsteps
3. I had been called a CCP, JHK, Pinoy, but they never called me a CECA..
>
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)