As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly
Scripture readings for Christmas
31-08-2025, 07:41 PM
As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly
31-08-2025, 08:20 PM
(31-08-2025, 07:33 PM)pinkpanther Wrote: Yes .His words often pointed to the future, with the Holy Spirit eventually revealing more complete understanding to his followers...so the fulfillment is from the Holy spirit...
In the Gospel of John, Jesus promises that after his departure, the Holy Spirit will come to guide his disciples into "all truth" and to "tell them what is to come". ...so we do not need Muhammad!
The fulfillment is the Holy Spirit now. So it changed from Jesus yesterday to the Holy Spirit today.
31-08-2025, 08:23 PM
As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly
31-08-2025, 08:26 PM
31-08-2025, 09:11 PM
31-08-2025, 09:12 PM
(31-08-2025, 08:20 PM)Ali Imran Wrote: The fulfillment is the Holy Spirit now. So it changed from Jesus yesterday to the Holy Spirit today.
It does not mean the work of Jesus has been replaced, but rather that the Spirit's role is to apply Jesus's life, death, and resurrection to believers today, making him known and felt in their hearts and lives.
31-08-2025, 09:30 PM
31-08-2025, 09:54 PM
Yesterday, 07:05 AM
Yesterday, 07:38 AM
Yesterday, 08:11 AM
As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly
Yesterday, 08:18 AM
(Yesterday, 07:38 AM)pinkpanther Wrote: God is not partial but wholly divine. Therefore, the Father does not become a "partial divine being" but remains fully God, as does each Person of the Trinity
The Father is 1 fully divine being.
The Son is 1 fully divine being.
The Holy Spirit is 1 fully divine being.
So there are 3 fully divine beings, correct?
Yesterday, 09:05 AM
Yesterday, 10:58 AM
Yesterday, 11:08 AM
Repeat repeat repeat repeat repeat repeat again

As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly
Yesterday, 01:25 PM
Yesterday, 01:26 PM
Yesterday, 01:51 PM
(Yesterday, 11:08 AM)Lukongsimi Wrote: Repeat repeat repeat repeat repeat repeat again
(Yesterday, 01:26 PM)pinkpanther Wrote: He can repeat for another few more months still useless
He repeats so that he does not need to answer questions on the Quran and hadith
Let's move on lah!

Yesterday, 02:10 PM
Yesterday, 02:16 PM
Yesterday, 04:53 PM
(Yesterday, 08:18 AM)Ali Imran Wrote: The Father is 1 fully divine being.
The Son is 1 fully divine being.
The Holy Spirit is 1 fully divine being.
So there are 3 fully divine beings, correct?
In Islam, one of the 99 names of Allah (God) is “Loving.” But what — or whom — was He loving before creation?
Yesterday, 05:04 PM
(Yesterday, 01:25 PM)pinkpanther Wrote: one single divine being (God) who exists as three distinct single divine person.
Are the 3 distinct persons also 3 distinct beings?
We are doing simple counting. When you say being, I wanna know how many beings? When you say person, I wanna know how many persons. So far, I'm still very confused.
Yesterday, 06:20 PM
(Yesterday, 05:04 PM)Ali Imran Wrote: Are the 3 distinct persons also 3 distinct beings?
We are doing simple counting. When you say being, I wanna know how many beings? When you say person, I wanna know how many persons. So far, I'm still very confused.
There is just one being in three distinct persons...what's so confusing about that? Do you get confused when you see water existing in three different states?
8 hours ago
Historical mistake in the Quran: Dirham and countable currency in Egypt
Quran 12:20 states: “And they sold him for a reduced price - a few dirhams - and they were, concerning him, of those content with little.”
Two things need to be noticed with this passage.
First off, dirhams were introduced in the 7th century (AD), evolving from the Greek drachma. The story as detailed in Quran 12:20, taking place in Ancient Egypt, predates the creation of the dirham by many, many centuries. In other words, the Quran gets wrong that dirhams existed in ancient Egypt, and people bargained with them.
You could use the argument that the author of the Quran knew that the ancient Egyptians didn’t have dirhams, but was helping the Arabs at the time visualize a physical currency.
Here’s where the second problem comes in.
Ancient Egyptians of that time had no countable currency. Instead, they ran on a bartering system, measuring the value of items by weighing them. In other words, no countable currency existed in Ancient Egypt, and specifically, when the story of Quran 12:20 takes place.
To summarize, the Quran makes the mistakes of stating that ancient Egyptians had dirhams, as well as the fact that they had a countable currency. Both of these statements are true, and Quran 12:20 wouldn’t play out how it does (in the real world).
Quran 12:20 states: “And they sold him for a reduced price - a few dirhams - and they were, concerning him, of those content with little.”
Two things need to be noticed with this passage.
First off, dirhams were introduced in the 7th century (AD), evolving from the Greek drachma. The story as detailed in Quran 12:20, taking place in Ancient Egypt, predates the creation of the dirham by many, many centuries. In other words, the Quran gets wrong that dirhams existed in ancient Egypt, and people bargained with them.
You could use the argument that the author of the Quran knew that the ancient Egyptians didn’t have dirhams, but was helping the Arabs at the time visualize a physical currency.
Here’s where the second problem comes in.
Ancient Egyptians of that time had no countable currency. Instead, they ran on a bartering system, measuring the value of items by weighing them. In other words, no countable currency existed in Ancient Egypt, and specifically, when the story of Quran 12:20 takes place.
To summarize, the Quran makes the mistakes of stating that ancient Egyptians had dirhams, as well as the fact that they had a countable currency. Both of these statements are true, and Quran 12:20 wouldn’t play out how it does (in the real world).
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 12 Guest(s)