[Ali Imran]

You need to first learn to be humble. You know you have almost zero knowledge, The Bible is well preserved and reliable but you argue as though you are a learned person. You only have a few scholars that would support your case

The Quran affirmed the Injil that was revealed to Jesus and the Christians were reading it....what they were reading were exactly the same as what we read today according to scholars..so what corruption are you talking about? You made a claim that we do not have the Injil that directly contradicts the Quran and it also claim that Mohamed was mentioned in the torah and Gospel..

Since you cannot find the Prophet's name in the scriptures, the convenient explanation is that our books have been corrupted. It is quite ironic that Jesus, according to the Quran, made a claim about the name of Muhammad which is said to be found in our scriptures...yet Allah supposedly failed to preserve this crucial piece of information. Islam often makes assertions that it cannot substantiate with concrete proof, raising questions about their validity.

Did Jesus preach the Gospel according to Mark? Or preach the Gospel according to Matthew? The answer is no. So, do you have the words of Jesus, ie the Injeel? No.

How come you still bringing the same argument when you were already told that you don't have the words of Jesus?