24-06-2025, 07:34 AM
(24-06-2025, 07:26 AM)Ali Imran Wrote: Surely yes, it is a corruption. When the original has been changed, it is definitely a corruption.
If you don't like the word "corruption", we can call it manipulation. Some people manipulated the scriptures, for what reasons?
It was there in huge numbers...you cannot say it is falsely written...there is no wrong to assume it to be an later addition when compared to codex or other manuscripts....
there is a footnote on the longer ending of mark..