[ArielCasper]

I spend time watching the debate I was trying hard to understand the S'pore examples given by Shanmugan:

1. Terrex  incident  - many pro China views
2. Malaysian dispute...pro Malaysia views spread.

I cant understand what the law has to do with the above. If we have have dispute with China or Malaysia ...they have bigger population and their Netizens will express views that tend to favor them on Internet.

Some Singaporeans  put those views on local sites simply because they have pro China views and voluntarily do so.... and others will just copy views from Malaysia site and post them for discussion usually get hammered down by Singaporeans.

Shanmugan says the law is not against Singaporeans expressing their view or censorship. Its to go after foreign interference 

However he can't come up with very clear examples on how the law is used.

What is this law suppose to do in the above examples?

His blood pressure is going up because no reasonable objective person can see justification for the laws he introduced.......

If there is anyone here ....plse explain.

If we believe any words from Ah Shan, then we have ourselves to blame..

I will always remember LSH kena sued for forwarding a FB post..

If forwarding can be sued (and only LSH is sued when hundreds would have forwarded the same post), then how can we trust that any new law will not work against us.. At the end of the day, it is only how powerful your lawyer, how much resources you have, to win a lawsuit here..