[Lukongsimi]

Your wives are as fields for you. You may enter your fields from any place you want. 

MUHAMMAD AND ANAL SEX

https://answeringislamblog.wordpress.com...-anal-sex/

Wow karchang preaching ?
RA preaching my goodness!

[Ali Imran]

Wow karchang preaching ?
RA preaching my goodness!

If you have a good heart, you will stop and look at where he is getting all that. From hate-Islam websites.

Your friend is not just a liar, he is spreading hate-Islam materials here.

You still want to believe him? Up to you. Your heart will help you decide.

[Lukongsimi]

After reading all their  horny teachings ,This confirms that the bible is Holy n true.

Jesus is The way the truth n the life

[Ali Imran]

After reading all their  horny teachings ,This confirms that the bible is Holy n true.

Jesus is The way the truth n the life

Have you read the OT? One time, the teacher association in Hong Kong wanted to ban the Bible because of the x-rated material it contains.

Why don't you google x-rated writings in bible and see what you get? I'm too polite to post it here.

[Lukongsimi]

Got black white proof how not to believe?
Only his followers try to cover up the hornee.
hornee heart n mind loves it but not me
I find it stupid !

[Lukongsimi]

he likes to answer islamic question..here is one for him

How could Muhammad  speak obscene words, such as “Tell him to bite his father’s p_nis”, and approve of Abu Bakr saying, “Suck the clitoris of al-Laat”, even though the Prophet forbade obscene speech? Can you give a detailed response?

The most terrible teachings I have come across !

[pinkpanther]

Ibn Jarir reported from ibn Abi Mulayka that he was asked about having sex with a women in her rear, so he said: “I wanted to do that last night with a slave girl of mine, but it was hard for me (to penetrate), hence I sought the assistance of oil.”

Al-Khatib reported in Ruwati Malik from Abi Sulayman Al-Juzjani, who said: I asked Malik bin Anas about sex with women in their rear, so he said: “(I just did this act) and have just washed my head.” (Al-Suyuti Al-Durr Al-Manthur Fi Tafsir Bil-Ma’thur, Volume 2, p. 612)

Scholars have disputed on anal sex, and that was after having made an Ijma (“consensus”) on having pleasure with all parts of the woman’s body (to be permissible) except from the anus. Malik said: “It is okay for a man to have anal sex with his woman the same as it is okay for him to have vaginal sex.”

What is spreading lies? Can't you read at the end of the 2nd paragraph ..there is a tafsir on this topic

Ibn Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allah said: “Allah will not look at a man who has intercourse with a woman in her back passage.” (At-Tirmidhi)

[pinkpanther]

Why are you saying that I spread lies? Hope will see no issue with the discussion of anal sex...he will say Islam reveals everything...it is the way of life...why are you so defensive 

[pinkpanther]

After reading all their  horny teachings ,This confirms that the bible is Holy n true.

Jesus is The way the truth n the life

Bible is not interested in this topic

[pinkpanther]

The most terrible teachings I have come across !

To some it is the best teachings...I am sure Hope will agree with me

[pinkpanther]

I didn't know moslems were so open to the discussion of anal sex back then....everyone has a piece of their own mind....I love the moslems man..

[Lukongsimi]

I didn't know moslems were so open to the discussion of anal sex back then....everyone has a piece of their own mind....I love the moslems man..

Means most gays are their kind?

[pinkpanther]

Means most gays are their kind?

Take a good look at Malaysia pm anwar Ibrahim..he was convicted of sodomy with boys and was sentenced 2 times...and Islam says it is OK..you can lead the nation....

Singapore will never allow a person like him to stay around

[Lukongsimi]

To some it is the best teachings...I am sure Hope will agree with me

Wonder the flying donkey got poked halfway up?

[pinkpanther]

Wonder the flying donkey got poked halfway up?

Islamic laws says cannot poke donkey ....it is a major crime

[Lukongsimi]

Take a good look at Malaysia pm anwar Ibrahim..he was convicted of sodomy with boys and was sentenced 2 times...and Islam says it is OK..you can lead the nation....

Singapore will never allow a person like him to stay around

Sodom n Gomorrah was destroyed because of gays.
Dare to teach about anal sex is confirmed not God sent prophet.

[pinkpanther]

Take a good look at Malaysia pm anwar Ibrahim..he was convicted of sodomy with boys and was sentenced 2 times...and Islam says it is OK..you can lead the nation....

Singapore will never allow a person like him to stay around

He will be stoned to death in Saudi Arabia... Malaysia go easy with Anwar

[Lukongsimi]

He will be stoned to death in Saudi Arabia... Malaysia go easy with Anwar

Maybe he repented?

[Lukongsimi]

Islamic laws says cannot poke donkey ....it is a major crime

How about Other animals leh?

[pinkpanther]

Sodom n Gomorrah was destroyed because of gays.
Dare to teach about anal sex is confirmed not God sent prophet.

Some say it is allowed some say it is not....let just say Islam doesnt allow anal sex   what is fascinating for me is that the moslems back then suddenly become active in this discussion 

https://islamqa.info/en/answers/91968/an...ermissible

[pinkpanther]

How about Other animals leh?

Narrated Ibn 'Abbas: That the Messenger of Allah said: "Whomever you see having relations with an animal then kill him and kill animal." So it was said to Ibn 'Abbas: "What is the case of the animal?" He said: "I did not hear anything from the Messenger of Allah about this, but I see that the Messenger of Allah disliked eating its meat or using it, due to the fact that such a (heinous) thing has been done with that animal."

— Jami` at-Tirmidhi, 17:38

[Ali Imran]

Most religionists know about the parable of the Pharisees, but beyond the narration of their self-centeredness is an object lesson on the doctrine of justification by faith alone taught by Jesus. The one occasion where Jesus actually declared someone "justified" provides the best insight into the doctrine as He taught it.

He told this parable to certain people who trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and viewed others with contempt. Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax-gatherer. The Pharisee stood and was praying thus to himself, "God, I thank Thee that I'm not like other people: swindlers, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax-gatherer. I fast twice a week; I pay tithes of all that I get."

But the tax-gatherer, standing some distance away, was even unwilling to lift up his eyes to heaven, but was beating his chest, saying, "God, be merciful to me, the sinner!" "I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other, for everyone who exalts himself shall be humbled, but he who humbles himself shall be exalted" (Luke 18:9-14).

That parable surely shocked Jesus's listeners. They trusted in themselves that they were righteous (Luke 18:9) - the very definition of self righteousness. Their theological heroes were the Pharisees who held to the most rigid legalistic standards. They fasted, made a great show of praying and giving alms. Yet Jesus had stunned multitudes by saying, "Unless your righteous surpasses that of the scribes, and Pharisees, you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven (Matt 5:20), followed by, "You are to be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect (Matt 5:48).

Clearly, Jesus set a standard that was humanly impossible, for no one could surpass the rigorous living of the scribes and pharisees. Now He further astounds His listeners with this spiritual lesson that seems to place a detestable tax-gatherer in a better position spiritually than a praying Pharisee. Jesus's point is clear. He was teaching that justification is by faith alone. All the theology of justification is there, and Jesus clearly painted the picture for us with this parable.

The tax collector "went down to his house justified" (Luke 18:14) - not because of anything he had done, but because of what had been done on his behalf. Notice that the tax collector understood his own helplessness. He owned an impossible debt he knew he couldn't pay. All he could do was repent and plead for mercy. Contrast his prayer with that of the arrogant Pharisee. He didn't recite what he had done. He knew that even his best works were sin. And he didn't offer to do anything for God. He simply pleaded for divine mercy. He was looking for God to do for him what he couldn't do for himself.

That's the very nature of the penitence Jesus called for. Furthermore, this man went away justified without performing any works of penance, without doing any sacrament or ritual, without any meritorious works whatsoever. His justification was complete without any of those things because it was solely on the basis of faith. Everything necessary to atone for his sins and provide forgiveness had already been done on his behalf. He was justified by faith on the spot. Again, he makes a stark contrast with the smug Pharisee who was so certain that all his fasting and tithing and other works made him acceptable to God. But while the working Pharisee remained unjustified, the believing tax-gatherer received full justification by faith alone.

Remember Jesus's statement from the Sermon on the Mount, "Unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and pharisees, you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven" (Matt 5:20). Yet now Jesus states that this tax-gatherer -  the most wicked of men - was justified. How did such a
sinner obtain a righteousness that exceeded that of the Pharisee? How could a traitorous tax-collector ever become just in God's eyes?

The only possible answer is that he received a righteousness that wasn't his own (Philippians 3:9). Righteousness was imputed to him by faith (Rom 4:9-11). Whose righteousness was reckoned to him? Needless to say, it was the perfect righteousness of a flawless Substitute, who in turn must bear the tax-gatherer's sins and suffer the penalty of God's wrath in his place. The gospel tells us that is precisely what Jesus did. The tax-gatherer was justified. God declared him righteous, imputing to him the full and perfect righteousness of Christ, forgiving him of all unrighteousness, and delivering him from all condemnation. Forever thereafter he stood before God on the ground of a perfect righteousness that had been reckoned to his account.

That's what justification means. It's the only true gospel. A right understanding of justification by faith is the very foundation of the gospel. Every "different gospel" is under the eternal curse of God.

"And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which
is of God by faith" (Philippians 3:9).

For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven - Matthew 5

Does the beautiful story of the tax collector that teaches repentance cancel what Jesus said in Matthew 5? No it doesn't. Maybe you have a different opinion. If so, I'd like to hear.

Furthermore, this man went away justified without performing any works of penance, without doing any sacrament or ritual, without any meritorious works whatsoever. His justification was complete without any of those things because it was solely on the basis of faith.

That's called argument from silence, a logical fallacy. You don't know if that man did any work of penance or whatever. You are just assuming.

The only possible answer is that he received a righteousness that wasn't his own (Philippians 3:9).

Allow me to remind you of a verse in Luke. I say unto you that likewise more joy shall be in Heaven over one sinner that repenteth, than over ninety and nine just persons who need no repentance.

So that is the better answer, isn't it?

Our prophet صلي الله عليه وسلم said, “Every son of Adam commits sin, and the best of those who commit sin are those who repent."

[Lukongsimi]

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSrFnmKyK/
The Alpha n The Omega

[pinkpanther]

This fellow was really well fed today...he actually copy and paste 2 biblical passages and put Muhammad name in arabic....this is the best of efforts during this Ramadan or some would describe it to the sun set in muddy spring....

Sometimes it is mind blogging to see the effort

It is like a brain dead person on life support actually recovered ....it is unbelievable....Subhan Yeshua!

[pinkpanther]

Maybe he repented?

I believe Anwar surpasses Muhammad. While we may not truly understand Muhammad through reading, we can look at Anwar as a case study

Early in his political career, he faced challenges and was misled, went to jail for over 10+ years...but now he has been guided to lead Malaysia. He has endured suffering and oppression, yet he has done an outstanding job in his leadership.

 If there is indeed an Islamic Allah, I feel that He is close to Anwar.

[Lukongsimi]

Recently dreamt the earth shooks and the buildings shaking
Today earthquakes 7.7 mag wow!

[pinkpanther]

Recently dreamt the earth shooks and the buildings shaking
Today earthquakes 7.7 mag wow!

Where? Your dream is accurate

[pinkpanther]

I find this funny! There are so many talks on anal sex

It was related about Al Harith Ibn Yakub that he narrated about Abi Al-Habab Sa’id Ibn Yassar that he asked Ibn Umar and said, “O Abu Abdul Rahman! We buy slave girls, so may we commit Nahmid with them?” So he replied, “And what is this Nahmid?” He responded, “(penetrating) the ANUS.” Ibn Umar said, “Wow, Wow! Does a believer do that?”

[Lukongsimi]

Where? Your dream is accurate

https://youtu.be/KfzY_mgeS9Y?si=lW3SzpqnXhHaHKQu

[cheekopekman]

Actually there's a reason why Muslims and other religions cannot understand and accept Christianity lah! The key is in the Holy Spirit lah! Believe it or not up to you all lah!