(30-11-2023, 01:48 AM)S I M T A N Wrote: People were led to believe that the Oxley saga had arisen because of the sibling differences over the fate of that house. After the sibling quarrels were made known in public, we realised there could be more to this family saga than meets the eye, such as sibling rivalry.
I have a similar true story to tell. My friend's grandad was the firstborn son. His grandad had two younger brothers, but he was the only son who took after his dad in having a passion for doing business. He was the favourite son and was taught the trick of the trade. Naturally he grew up and became a shrewd businessman just like his father, a prominent local businessman. This great granddad of my friend was also a member of the govt - an outdated term for minister in the era before LKY's - besides being the chair of SG Chinese Chamber of Commerce and for a brief stint he was SG's ambassador to Thailand.
Some people say a political leader needs to have a solid family structure that's free of sibling rivalry and other family woes if he's to be seen as a capable leader. Well, sibling rivalry and family bickering are commonplace in families, and may not necessarily impact one's professional life. LHL's relationship with his siblings isn't a happy one, but professionally, he's successful.
There are definitely more than meets the eye. 38OXR isn't about whether the old house was a subject for conservation consideration or otherwise, total demolition.
"LHL didn't even let his father fulfil his last wish to demolish the house" had been repeated in social media ad infinitum...........................by hypocrites who said that to politicise the matter to try to destroy PAP. I say PAP because these diehards won't stop even if LHL is somehow voted out. They will find other things to vilify the entire PAP and get it voted out.
This hypocrisy can also be seen in the "support" which LHY got and is still getting from the 39%. Are they really supporting him, or *making use* of him because he was/is considered a good material to use against LHL and PAP? No prize for giving the right answer.
It is hard for parents to love all chewren equally. This is not a simpur thing like cutting a cake into 3 equal slices, one for each child. Splitting their affection equally for the three younger Lees, spending an equal amount of time with each of them...they might have unconsciously given a little more to the favourite child, while the other two could sense that, the body language, the tone of voice, and build up resentment over the years. (Yang could have been their mother's favourite child being the younger son and youngest child)
It also has to do with chemistry. LKY might have just found talking to LHL to be more "enjoyable" if they both share similar views, domestic and global, and can "clique" better. One might also use this explanation for why LKY would often bring George Yeo along for his overseas trips. Would the other ministers become jealous, and resent that which they might perceive as LKY practising favouritism? Well, George had spoken: he believed so without of course mentioning names. He also said, his mother (presumably a woman with a brilliant mind) had told him to never compete with his (LKY's ) son. So, LKY and George had chemistry but it should only end at getting more overseas trips and being served, of course, ho liao 好料 by the host country。
We see this in companies too. In theory, a manager must be fair to all his subordinates, but oftentimes, we'd notice that the manager might favour one particular staff.