Posts: 18,486
   
Threads: 213
    
Likes Received: 4,599 in 4,121 posts
Likes Given: 6,330
Never believe a smelly khan aka liar.
Wherever you go, no matter what the weather, always bring your own sunshine
>
Posts: 18,486
   
Threads: 213
    
Likes Received: 4,599 in 4,121 posts
Likes Given: 6,330
How come TraceTogether boo-boo never go CoP? Also lie mah
Wherever you go, no matter what the weather, always bring your own sunshine
>
Posts: 4,879
   
Threads: 113
    
Likes Received: 1,657 in 1,276 posts
Likes Given: 1,213
(23-12-2021, 06:01 AM)jameslee58@hotmail.com Wrote: The psychatrist already said she has no mental problems
Pitam singh still want to protect her, suddenly pop up dissassociative disorder, why cant he just stick to one story, that she lied
Why pitam protect her so much?
She not mental and she lied in perfectly normal circumstances , thats perfect recipe for rotten character, and sengkang voters voted her to sit in Parliament which will dictate your future
How many stupid you can see in this whole scandal?
SK voted for WP team not RK. At that time, she was not known to be a liar.
Posts: 18,486
   
Threads: 213
    
Likes Received: 4,599 in 4,121 posts
Likes Given: 6,330
Racist stirrer and barefaced liar this RK is. Yoda like language, I speak
Wherever you go, no matter what the weather, always bring your own sunshine
>
Posts: 4,879
   
Threads: 113
    
Likes Received: 1,657 in 1,276 posts
Likes Given: 1,213
(23-12-2021, 05:31 AM)sgbuffett Wrote: RK claimed she was told 'maintain the narrative unless pressed'....assuming this was said.
Thatvmeans she was to tell the truth questioned...she never did on 4th Oct.
She also said she was told to "take it to grave". Assuming she heard this ...
In the context, I believe it is referring to her sexual abuse, if not revealed to public she will take that to grave.
I watched the COP many times all the interpretation of events p that she was told to lie came out of ET mouth. ET was leading the witness. "Maintain narrative unless pressed..."...actually means keep quiet first unless questioned tell the truth. RK was given time to tell her family before actual clarification. If it was meant for her to discuss with family on way forward and whether she was to tell public she was sex abuse victim for her clarification of truth. If not her sexual abuse will be taken with her to the grave.
Because a person goes and eat does not mean he is greedy for food. The second part is an interpretation. ET was leading the witness to various interpretations and because she was out of WP and her actions led to DP ruling against ... she agreed with various interpretations made by ET.
There was never any evidence supporting WP leaders telling RK to lie and cover up permanently.
ET was supposed to find facts and objectively determine the truth. Not to head for conclusions favorable for PAP to use against the opposition.
Yes agreed. Rk is the weakest link in WP so ET pounced on her. She is easily led by ET's crafty persuasions and suggestions. His use of words and sentences are designed to lead to his own conclusions.
Now we only how evil some lawyers can be.
(This post was last modified: 23-12-2021, 06:30 AM by
RichDad.)
Posts: 4,037
   
Threads: 178
    
Likes Received: 931 in 791 posts
Likes Given: 1,008
(23-12-2021, 06:21 AM)RichDad Wrote: Actually she quoted PS as saying "take the information to the grave". But ET suggested "take it, ie, the lie to the grave".
Information is vague. Could mean her sexual assault or lie. Clever lawyer leading questioning trick.
This is dragging too long. I thought they said almost finished? WP will likely be found guilty of wrong doing lah. Only thing is the penalty....
The problem is PS claimed he never say "Take it to the grave" statement, whereas RK vividly remembered he did..
This is crucial material in deciding the sentences for RK...
1) Whether she lied several times or only once in Parliament?
2) Whether she was misled by WP Leaders into continuing lying in Parliament?
If COP cannot comes to a clear verdict, then the matter may proceed to a higher juridical court?
Posts: 5,893
   
Threads: 2,208
    
Likes Received: 2,080 in 1,515 posts
Likes Given: 1
(23-12-2021, 09:27 AM)moonrab Wrote: If COP cannot comes to a clear verdict, then the matter may proceed to a higher juridical court?
This time, ET is smarter in questioning Khan.
ET has confirmed that after the 2nd lie, the 3 WP leaders did not question her on why she had lied 2nd time.
ET has confirmed that the WP leaders did not ask her if she had informed her parents.
COP can only conclude that WP has asked her to continue to lie and thus no need to question her on 2nd lie and no need to check with her on her parents.
The verdict is that WP is guilty.
Posts: 4,037
   
Threads: 178
    
Likes Received: 931 in 791 posts
Likes Given: 1,008
Rk completely disagree with PS.
Insist he told her take it to the grave.
http://www.asiaone.com/singapore/raeesah...-grave?amp
Posts: 5,893
   
Threads: 2,208
    
Likes Received: 2,080 in 1,515 posts
Likes Given: 1
(23-12-2021, 09:39 AM)forum456 Wrote: This time, ET is smarter in questioning Khan.
ET has confirmed that after the 2nd lie, the 3 WP leaders did not question her on why she had lied 2nd time.
ET has confirmed that the WP leaders did not ask her if she had informed her parents.
COP can only conclude that WP has asked her to continue to lie and thus no need to question her on 2nd lie and no need to check with her on her parents.
The verdict is that WP is guilty.
if there is no clear witness or concrete evidence on who is lying, the verdict will be based on whose evidence will be most trustable to fit the scenarios or actions taken by WP leaders,Khan and WP supporters.
Why WP leaders did not question her on 2nd lie ?
Why WP leaders did not check with on her if she had informed her parents ?
The only conclusion is that there is no need because WP has asked her to continue the lie.
Posts: 1,093
   
Threads: 4
    
Likes Received: 165 in 142 posts
Likes Given: 281
If RK is such expert snake at lying, why did she confess to WP leadership within few days of parliament lie? Shows she not so expert at lying after all and was seeking help from WP leadership how to manage.
If WP leadership already expected a possibility that RK could admit in October 4th parliament sitting, then they must prepare her texts, with view to minimize party damage. However absolutely nothing was done. Is that even plausible?
Posts: 3,216
   
Threads: 0
    
Likes Received: 414 in 403 posts
Likes Given: 0
Nobody get to know the truth,,,
Posts: 40,624
   
Threads: 2,336
    
Likes Received: 5,887 in 5,127 posts
Likes Given: 4,090
(23-12-2021, 12:04 AM)EXBB Wrote: Who is the real liar ? Left or right ?
Sama Sama!
Posts: 2,461
   
Threads: 338
    
Likes Received: 848 in 631 posts
Likes Given: 0
A liar will always be a liar. Cannot change its spot
8
>
(This post was last modified: 23-12-2021, 10:15 AM by
klat.)
Posts: 13,301
   
Threads: 1,502
    
Likes Received: 3,257 in 2,448 posts
Likes Given: 9,460
(23-12-2021, 09:50 AM)forum456 Wrote: if there is no clear witness or concrete evidence on who is lying, the verdict will be based on whose evidence will be most trustable to fit the scenarios or actions taken by WP leaders,Khan and WP supporters.
Why WP leaders did not question her on 2nd lie ?
Why WP leaders did not check with on her if she had informed her parents ?
The only conclusion is that there is no need because WP has asked her to continue the lie.
Got question her lah, dumbass
SL testified that she asked RK why she continued to lie and also to seek her own legal advice
Isnt this clear enough that this is her own problem?
(This post was last modified: 23-12-2021, 10:20 AM by
Sentinel.)
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)